Einstein's E=mc^2: How Did He Reach His Equation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WARGREYMONKKTL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and implications of Einstein's equation E=mc², exploring its mathematical foundations and applications in various contexts, including quantum mechanics and classical physics. Participants express curiosity about the complexity of the mathematics involved and the equation's limitations in specific scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on how Einstein derived E=mc² and the mathematical tools he used, expressing uncertainty about the complexity of the derivation.
  • Links to external resources are provided by participants to aid understanding, including personal derivations and papers.
  • One participant questions the applicability of E=mc² to "nano matter" and "massive matter," prompting a discussion about the conditions under which the equation holds, particularly in isolated systems versus interacting systems.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between E=mc² and quantum mechanics, with some participants suggesting that while they can be related, they represent different frameworks of physics.
  • Participants introduce the Klein-Gordon Equation as a connection between E=mc² and quantum mechanics, discussing the substitution of operators and the implications for wave functions.
  • Some participants express a lack of understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, such as the wave function and its notation, indicating a need for foundational knowledge before tackling advanced topics.
  • A philosophical discussion emerges regarding the nature of physics and its relationship to personal beliefs, with one participant reflecting on the intersection of science and spirituality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the mathematical derivations and implications of E=mc². There is no consensus on the limitations of the equation in specific contexts, and discussions about quantum mechanics reveal differing perspectives on its relationship to special relativity.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of familiarity with advanced mathematical concepts, which may limit their ability to engage fully with the discussion. The conversation also touches on philosophical interpretations of physics, which may not align with traditional scientific discourse.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students of physics and mathematics, particularly those exploring the foundations of relativity and quantum mechanics, as well as individuals interested in the philosophical implications of scientific theories.

WARGREYMONKKTL
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
hi!
i have a question. can you help me answer it?
i have studied physics about the equation E=mc^2. i know that everybody who studying physics know it. can some body show me how he got there? what maths mean that he used to reach that? i wonder if it is really complex?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
hi!
i have a question. can you help me answer it?
i have studied physics about the equation E=mc^2. i know that everybody who studying physics know it. can some body show me how he got there? what maths mean that he used to reach that? i wonder if it is really complex?
thanks!
Hi!

In addition to Rob's link you can take a look at my own derivation of the relation. See -
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/mass_energy_equiv.htm
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/einsteins_box.htm

Pete
 
thanks very much! actually when i first look at the first website i don't really know what it is talking about. but the second one is helping me work out very good. i have one more question why they say that the equation will not work for nano matter or massive matter can you explain to me why?
whanks !
 
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
why they say that the equation will not work for nano matter ...
I never heard that.
.. or massive matter can you explain to me why?
whanks !
If you're speaking about large objects then it holds for isolated objects and isolated systems. If the object is interacting with its surroundings then the relation E = mc2 will not hold since there may be stress on the object and the mass of an extended object is a function of stress and that relation is invalid. There is a derivation to show this. I thought I placed it online but I can't find it. I'll upload it someday. Meanwhile you can see an example in a paper I wrote. See

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/mass_paper.pdf

See the part where it talks about a rod under stress. Enjoy!

Pete
 
can you show me how to go to the wave function psi from the einstein equation e=mc2?
thanks you very much!
 
The wave function [tex]|\psi \rangle[/tex] or [tex]\psi (x)[/tex] is a quantum mechanical idea. E=mc^2 is a special relativistic one. You can indeed combine the two of them to make quantum field theory, but you cannot use E=mc^2 to derive a quantum picture of something, since that isn't what relativity is about.

It's like being given a large canvas and paint and then being asked to produce a carved statue, they are not the same form of art.
 
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
can you show me how to go to the wave function psi from the einstein equation e=mc2?
thanks you very much!
e=mc2 can be used to obtain the relationship

E^2 - (pc)^2 = (mc^2)^2

Now substute the operators for E = > E_op = H (Hamiltonian) and p => p_op to get

H^2 - (c*p_o)^2 = (mc^2)^2

Now multipiply through by the ket corresponding to psi => |psi> to obtain

H^2|psi> - (c*p_o)^2 |psi> = (mc^2)^2 |psi>

This is called the Klein-Gordon Equation.

Pete
 
can you give more information about psi. what is the phrase that decribe it
 
  • #10
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
can you give more information about psi. what is the phrase that decribe it
I thought you knew what psi was since you asked

"can you show me how to go to the wave function psi from the einstein equation e=mc2?"

|psi> is the state ket corresponding to the wave function psi(x,y,z,t). I.e.

psi(x,y,z,t) = <x,y,z,t|psi>

Pete
 
  • #11
thanks for that. actually i don't really know about the wave function so can you help me know more clear about it. such as what is its use in physics, why there is x,y,z,t is that for space-time?
my math skill is not enough to comprehend it.
thanks!
 
  • #12
pmb_phy said:
e=mc2 can be used to obtain the relationship

E^2 - (pc)^2 = (mc^2)^2

Now substute the operators for E = > E_op = H (Hamiltonian) and p => p_op to get

H^2 - (c*p_o)^2 = (mc^2)^2

Now multipiply through by the ket corresponding to psi => |psi> to obtain

H^2|psi> - (c*p_o)^2 |psi> = (mc^2)^2 |psi>

This is called the Klein-Gordon Equation.

Pete
what is p in phrase -(pc)^2
how can you substitute it in that equation please give more advice.
 
  • #13
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
thanks for that. actually i don't really know about the wave function so can you help me know more clear about it. such as what is its use in physics
It's the state symbol given to a particle or field. You might be better off reading some of the quantum physics forum.

Quantum mechanics is normally introduced via differential equations and potentials. [tex]|\psi\rangle[/tex] is a form of notation usually used later, once someone is comfortable with the basic notions of quantum physics. It's hard to explain the details of the [tex]|\psi \rangle[/tex] notation if you're not familiar with the basics of Hilbert spaces.
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
why there is x,y,z,t is that for space-time?
Yes. Generally implicit within [tex]|\psi \rangle[/tex] are the variables x,y,z,t along with anything else needed to describe the particle or field like spins, momentum, charge, etc. If you're specifically wanting to talk about a certain variable, like time, you might write it as [tex]|\psi (t) \rangle[/tex]
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
what is p in phrase -(pc)^2
p is the standard notation for momentum.

If you're unfamiliar with any of the notation in this thread, you'd probably find it easier (and a lot less frustrating) if you start at the basic ideas of QM and work your way up. Having decent knowledge of differential equations is a good place to start I think :smile:
 
  • #14
thanks you for helping with that.
i want to ask that are you a college student or a high school student?
 
  • #15
I'm in the UK, so I don't know exactly what ages 'high school' or 'college' apply to, but I'm a 4th year applied maths student in university (I'm 22).
 
  • #16
WARGREYMONKKTL said:
thanks you for helping with that.
i want to ask that are you a college student or a high school student?
If you were asking that question to me then I'am a 45 year old physicist. I got a BA in physics and mathematics and did part of a masters degree in physics. - Pete
 
Last edited:
  • #17
hi
i am in the united state.
i am a high school student. like you you probably a student in university.
what will you do after you graduate?
sorry to talk too much.
i want to ask you about a thinking that i can not understand it.
we know that math is a most powerful tool of physics right?
but how can we apply math in really simple physics problems and really complex phyiscs problem?
such as the problem about a pond that have a faucet that let the water in and a faucet that let the water out. some body say it is really easy to solve that kind of problem. but some people say it must have applied calculus to get the result?
you are an applied math student can you give me some advice or suggestion about that.
by the way if i have a solar panel and i put it is to the space. is it possible that the light is receives will propell is(give it the momentum?) if so how can we calculate that propulsion?
thanks !
nice to talk with you!
vincent is my real name.
 
  • #18
hi

pmb_phy said:
If you were asking that question to me then I'am a 45 year old physicist. I got a BA in physics and mathematics and did part of a masters degree in physics. - Pete
it is my pleasure to talk to a physicist!
the internet is so wonderful!
i am only 18 year old and i am a student in high school.
i want to ask you a question about phylosophy of physics.
everybody have his own opinion, right?
what do you think about physics?
i am a Christian and i read the bible.
it say that all the matter in the universe just exist as it was.
"let there be light, and there was light." such as the universal gravity is itself like that, the magnetism too. i red the book name "the god equation" that tell about the modern physics, tell about string theory. i can not understand it at all because i do not have enough knowledge to comprehend it. but i think god crated this universe and there must be a universal rule for everything. i am a student but i want to pay whole my live to find that.
you have a good and achieving day sir.
nice to talk with you!
vincent
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K