Einstein's Summation Convention: Questions Answered

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nenyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convention Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the correct application of Einstein's Summation Convention in the context of calculating derivatives in Lagrangian mechanics. The derivative should be expressed as ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^p}## instead of ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^1}##. A critical miscalculation was identified where a factor of two was omitted, leading to the correct expression being ##2g_{11}\dot x^1 + g_{12}\dot x^2 + g_{21}\dot x^2##. This highlights the importance of accurately applying the summation convention to avoid errors in tensor calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and Einstein's Summation Convention
  • Knowledge of derivatives in the context of physics
  • Basic grasp of metric tensors, specifically ##g_{ij}##
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Einstein's Summation Convention in various physical contexts
  • Learn about the properties and applications of metric tensors in general relativity
  • Explore advanced topics in Lagrangian mechanics and their mathematical foundations
  • Investigate common pitfalls in tensor calculus and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying advanced mechanics or general relativity who seek to deepen their understanding of tensor calculus and the application of the summation convention.

nenyan
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Please see the attached pic.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 590
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative that is being calculated at first is not ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^1}##. It's ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^p}##. That p index is what the part in red is addressing.

You miscalculated when you calculated ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^1}##. You dropped a factor of two in calculating ##\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot x^1}g_{11}\dot x^1 \dot x^1##. This should be ##2g_{11}\dot x^1##, which means your second batch of stuff in red should be ##2g_{11}\dot x^1 + g_{12}\dot x^2 + g_{21}\dot x^2##. This is exactly the same as ##g_{l1}\dot x^l + g_{1m}\dot x^m##. Note how this expands upon doing the summation: ##g_{l1}\dot x^l + g_{1m}\dot x^m = g_{11}\dot x^1 + g_{21}\dot x^2 + g_{11}\dot x^1 + g_{12}\dot x^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you D H. Your reply is very useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K