Elastic Collision Homework: Find Max Angle of Swing

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic collision between a rolling ball and a hanging block, with the goal of determining the maximum angle through which the block swings after the collision. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically conservation of momentum and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the velocities of the block and ball post-collision and explore the implications of energy conservation in the system. There are attempts to calculate the angle of swing using various methods, including the work-energy theorem and conservation of energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using conservation of energy to relate kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy. There are ongoing questions about the validity of certain assumptions, such as the calculation of acceleration and the interpretation of energy values. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the upward movement of the block and the conversion of kinetic energy to potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific mass values for the objects involved, which complicates the numerical calculations. There is also a discussion about the implications of the collision duration on the acceleration calculations.

armolinasf
Messages
195
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a ball rolling on a frictionless horizontal surface of mass m and with velocity 5m/s. It collides elastically with a block mass 3m that is initially hanging at rest from a 50 cm wire that is hanging from the ceiling.Find the maximum angle through which the block swings after it is hit

Homework Equations



v=initial velocity=5
Rolling ball=m1=m
Hanging block = m2=3m

Velocity of hanging block after collision: (2m1/(m1+m2))v

Velocity of rolling ball after collision: ((m1-m2)/(m1+m2))v

The Attempt at a Solution



So using the two equations above I get that the velocity of the block is 2.5m/s and velocity of the ball is -2.5m/s. So far this agrees with the fact that this is an elastic collision the knietic energy afterwards is equal to the knietic energy before the collision.

So to find the angle I'm thinking that I need to find how far the block travels in the x direction, that way I can take the arctangent of the length of the string divided by the distance x to find an angle W.

I use the work energy theorem:W=Fx=max=K after. The masses will cancel so I have ax=K after. But the acceleration is just dv/dt which is a change in velocity over a very short time interval. My thinking is the collision is short enough to be called dt and since it goes from rest to 2.5 m/s that a=2.5.

X would then be (.5)(3)(2.5^2)/(2.5)=3.75 meters

angle W would then be arctan(375/50)=82 degrees

This does not seem reasonable since it would mean that the ball would leave the ground and some energy would be converted into gravitation potential energy...help is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The block WILL leave the surface, since it's suspended like a pendulum by the 50cm wire. That means energy WILL be converted into gravitational PE...
 
How would I calculate the upward movement if the initial momentum is entirely in the x direction?
 
armolinasf said:
How would I calculate the upward movement if the initial momentum is entirely in the x direction?

Use a conservation of energy approach. You've already got the block's initial post-collision velocity...
 
The initial kinetic energy was equal to 12.5 J and the kinetic energy of the block is 9.4 and the ball is 3.1 unless one of those velocities is wrong there isn't any more energy in the system to be accounted for...

Also I am curious, is the logic behind taking a=2.5 is sound?
 
armolinasf said:
The initial kinetic energy was equal to 12.5 J and the kinetic energy of the block is 9.4 and the ball is 3.1 unless one of those velocities is wrong there isn't any more energy in the system to be accounted for...

Also I am curious, is the logic behind taking a=2.5 is sound?

Since you don't have the actual masses of the ball or block, you can't really put a numerical KE value to either. (although you could say that the "specific KE" of the block is 12.5 J/kg)

The KE of the block is going to be converted to gravitational PE as it swings upwards on the end of the wire.

Regarding your value of acceleration, no, you really can't put a figure to the acceleration without knowing the actual time duration of the impact event. For nearly perfect undeformable objects this time would be vanishingly small, and the acceleration would approach infinite! Better to think in terms of impulse in those situations.

But you've got the KE of the block, and a way forward with energy conservation. So onward-ho!
 
Ok, So I set the KE=12.5=mgH and solved for H since this is where all the KE is converted into gravitational PE. H=.318. Since this is the distance above the ground I subtracted it from the length of the rope. This length then was the adjacent side of a right triangle formed by this side and the hypotenuse equal to the length of the string. arcos(50-32)/50 gave an angle of 67 degrees.
 
armolinasf said:
Ok, So I set the KE=12.5=mgH and solved for H since this is where all the KE is converted into gravitational PE. H=.318. Since this is the distance above the ground I subtracted it from the length of the rope. This length then was the adjacent side of a right triangle formed by this side and the hypotenuse equal to the length of the string. arcos(50-32)/50 gave an angle of 67 degrees.

Keep in mind that the mass of the block is 3m...
 
My mistake KE=12.5 was supposed to be KE=9.4...I should write it out: .5mv^2=mgh ==> H=v^2/2g. v=2.5, So 2.5^2/2(9.8)=.32
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K