Elastic scattering and target recoil

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Elastic scattering involves the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy during the interaction between particles. In this process, while the incident particle retains its initial momentum, the target particle can indeed recoil, acquiring kinetic energy through momentum transfer. This transfer occurs even if the incident particle's energy remains constant, as elastic scattering is defined by the conservation of both energy and momentum, not the absence of interaction. The discussion clarifies that elastic scattering is a valid concept, despite the complexities involved in energy transfer during interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic scattering principles
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation laws
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy concepts in particle physics
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic interactions, particularly in the context of Rutherford scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum transfer in particle collisions
  • Explore the concept of elastic vs. inelastic scattering in detail
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic fields in particle interactions
  • Review advanced topics in particle physics, focusing on energy conservation during collisions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and researchers interested in the mechanics of particle interactions and the principles of scattering.

copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I understand that in elastic scattering, the incident particle leaves the interaction with the same magnitude of momentum it had initially. But, can there also be a target particle recoil in this case? If the kinetic energy of the incident particle is conserved, how does the target particle acquire kinetic energy in recoiling? I see two possibilities:

1) the target particle acquires energy from the interaction between the two particles (for example, from the electromagnetic field for Rutherford scattering), or

2) the target particle acquires energy from the incident particle, in which case this doesn't meet the definition of elastic scattering. If this is the case, is "elastic scattering" really just an approximation for when the target particle is really heavy compared to the incident particle?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I understand that in elastic scattering, the incident particle leaves the interaction with the same magnitude of momentum it had initially.
That is wrong (it would mean no collision happened). If the momentum transfer is small compared to the momentum of the particle, it might be negligible, even if the target momentum is not negligible afterwards. This can happen with very fast and/or very light particles.

1) the target particle acquires energy from the interaction between the two particles (for example, from the electromagnetic field for Rutherford scattering), or
That is not possible in the way you describe. The electric field is conservative.

Elastic scattering just means that both particles stay the same afterwards. There is always energy and momentum transfer (otherwise it is no interaction at all).
 
I'm confused. The Wikipedia article on elastic scattering states that the kinetic energy of the incident particle is conserved. If the incident particle's energy doesn't change, and if, from what you say, the target can't acquire energy except through exchange with the incident particle, then what is the point of defining "elastic scattering," if it never actually happens?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
859
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K