# Electric charges and fields: Charged conducting spheres touching then separated

1. Apr 23, 2016

### Ujjwal28

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Two charged metallic spheres of same size repel each other by a force F. They are now touched with each other and are then separated to same initial distance. Now the force of repulsion is F'.

2. Relevant equations
On touching the spheres will reduce their charges... So the new force of repulsion should be less than the original one... Which is the case but there is also one more case in which the new force F' is greater than original force F. How is that possible?

3. The attempt at a solution
Okay so I got the first part correct that F' may be less than F. But I'm stuck here.. How can F' be possibly be larger than F?
When the charges do get distributed on touching.. Any help will be appreciated.

2. Apr 23, 2016

### SammyS

Staff Emeritus
Hello Ujjwal28. Welcome to PF !

Is this the complete question?

It doesn't seem like they both reduce their charges. If the charges are of the same sign, then the charge one will decrease, and that of the other will increase upon touching.

3. Apr 23, 2016

### Ujjwal28

Well yes this is the complete question. And what would he the new charges on a sphere A and B upon touching if.. Initially they carry 2 and 3 coulomb charge respectively? And in what case will the new force of repulsion F' be greater than before?

Last edited: Apr 23, 2016
4. Apr 23, 2016

### Ujjwal28

5. Apr 23, 2016

### SammyS

Staff Emeritus
What is the result of the touching of two identical spherical conductors, one with initial charge of 2 C the other with 3 C ?

6. Apr 23, 2016

### MullaTheMech

Can I get someone to explain to me how this is able to break Newtons action-reaction laws?

How is F able to change just by equaling out the charge? If the balls both start positive then I would think they would have the same force before and after touching.

7. Apr 23, 2016

### SammyS

Staff Emeritus
Take some example and calculate the force before and after equalization.

If you still have a question come back, but it's likely that starting a new thread of your own would be more appropriate.

8. Apr 23, 2016

### MullaTheMech

Sorry his question intrigued me.
My comments should probably get deleted.
With conservation of charge I thought that two objects with a positive charge would always repel each other with the same force even after touching. I would like to know the equation for equaling out charges.
I'll be waiting for Ujjwal to post what the charge for A & B are after the 2 & 3 coulomb balls touch.
I thought it was going to be simple and you just had to add them up and divide by 2.

9. Apr 23, 2016

### SammyS

Staff Emeritus
Yes, conservation of charge gives the result in your final sentence.

10. Apr 23, 2016

### MullaTheMech

Right... so I'm thinking I understand this. It seems I've given too much away. I hope you also understand it now Ujjwal.

11. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

Not really!! Ok so if two spheres having charges +2 coulomb and +3 coulomb are touched, after touching will the charges become 2.5 coulomb on both? Or am I doing something wrong?

12. Apr 24, 2016

### SammyS

Staff Emeritus
Yes, that's correct.

13. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

Ok so if that's true then.
Let's take the following case:
1-
Before touching sphere A has a charge of 2C and sphere B has a charge 3C. After touching the charges on both become 2.5C. So..
Repulsion before touching =6.k/r2and repulsion after touching =6.25.k/r2.okay so this proves how F' ( new repulsion) can be greater than F ( original repulsion).But how then F' can be less than F.. Can you please explain me that case?

14. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

15. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

When would be the repulsion less than before??

16. Apr 24, 2016

### MullaTheMech

1C×4C=4C
After touching
2.5C×2.5C=6.25C

But I don't think you have to use whole numbers

Is this giving too much away still?

17. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

Well that explains after touching the repulsion increases but there is also a case in which repulsion decreases after touching. Can you explain me that case?

18. Apr 24, 2016

### MullaTheMech

Whoops I was doing mental math... not good.
I was thinking starting with decimals would get you there. Sorry for confusing you. The guys on this site are usually much better at helping.

19. Apr 24, 2016

### Ujjwal28

Well that explains after touching the repulsion increases but there is also a case in which repulsion decreases after touching. Can you explain me that case?

20. Apr 24, 2016