Electric Dipole - Calulating the electic field from Potential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
smoking-frog
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the Electric field of a Dipole from its Potential.

[tex]\vec E=-\operatorname{grad}(\Phi_D)[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]\Phi_D(\vec R)=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \cdot \frac{\vec d \vec R}{R^3}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi all!

I am trying to calculate the electric Field of a Dipole from its Potential.

Specifically, I am trying to understand the following equation:[tex]\operatorname{grad}(\Phi_D)=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0R^3}\cdot((\vec d\cdot \vec R )\cdot \operatorname{grad}(\frac{1}{R^3})+\frac{1}{R^3} \cdot\operatorname{grad}(\vec d \cdot \vec R))[/tex]

I tried re-writing the equation according to the Einstein Notation:
[tex]\operatorname{grad}(\Phi_D)=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial R_j}\frac{d_k R_l}{(R_i R_i)^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]

Is that correct? If so, how will I go about proving the above identity?

Thank you all for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is fairly straightforward to show, using the definition of gradient and partial derivatives, that gradient satisfies the Leibniz rule, [tex]\operatorname{grad}(fg) = f \operatorname{grad}(g) + g \operatorname{grad}(f)[/tex]
where f and g are scalars
 
But they are not scalar, are they?

[tex]\vec d \text{ and } \vec R[/tex] are vectors...

The rule for vectors is, in my opinion, [tex] <br /> \operatorname{grad}(\vec a \cdot \vec b)=(\vec a \cdot \nabla) \cdot \vec b+(\vec b \cdot \nabla) \cdot \vec a+\vec a \times (\nabla \times\vec b)+\vec b \times (\nabla \times\vec a)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
smoking-frog said:
But they are not scalar, are they?

[tex]\vec d \text{ and } \vec R[/tex] are vectors...

Correct. But I thought in [itex]\phi[/itex] you had [itex]\vec{d} \cdot \vec{R}[/itex], which I believe is a scalar. Start from that and then note that [itex]\vec{d}[/itex]*is constant, so differentiating [itex]\vec{d} \cdot \vec{R}[/itex] is a bit simpler than that general formula suggests.
 
Oh ok.

I actually tried that already, but the result was 0 for some reason...
But it's good to know I had the right idea and obviously just got lost in the math on the way.
I guess I'll simply try it again :)

Thanks for your help!