Electric field at (0,0) for this charged square conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field at the center (0,0) of a charged square conductor is definitively zero due to symmetry. While initial assumptions may suggest using Gauss's law, the square charge density lacks the necessary symmetry for this approach. Instead, one should visualize the electric field vectors from each side of the square, which cancel out in pairs, confirming that the net electric field at the center is zero. This conclusion is supported by the inability to simplify the integral using a spherical Gaussian surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Ability to visualize symmetry in charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the application of Gauss's law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field vector calculations for various charge distributions
  • Study the implications of symmetry in electrostatics
  • Investigate graphical methods for visualizing electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and charge distributions.

requied
Messages
98
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
If this figure below is a conductor, what will be the electric field at (0,0) for the square charge distribution
Relevant Equations
Gauss' Law
1590920527485.png


Can we assume that square charge resembles a sphere shell, and think like electric field at sphere shell's center is 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1590922130848.png

This solution is true ? According to this,the electric field is 0 on anyplace in the square conductor.
 
No this solution is not correct. You can't take the E out of the integral, as you do in the 2nd line, because the spherical gaussian surface is not symmetrical with respect to the square charge density.
 
You are only asked for the field at (0,0). Isn't the answer obvious by symmetry?
 
haruspex said:
You are only asked for the field at (0,0). Isn't the answer obvious by symmetry?
Yeah it is obvious but I must attach an explain and show the calculations. Have you any offer to do it by this way? Or maybe a figure which can explain.
 
Delta2 said:
You can't take the E out of the integral, as you do in the 2nd line, because the spherical gaussian surface is not symmetrical with respect to the square charge density.
I have a trouble with square shape symmetry. How can I come through of it? Or maybe I don't have to show calculations, just draw a figure which can explain the logic.
 
requied said:
I have a trouble with square shape symmetry. How can I come through of it? Or maybe I don't have to show calculations, just draw a figure which can explain the logic.
Well the truth is that this square shaped charge density doesn't offer us with any symmetry that would be useful in Gauss's law. You just can't use Gauss's law (with any possible gaussian surface) to solve for the electric field in the interior.

However the point (0,0) has a special symmetry. To see this symmetry , try to draw the electric field vectors at the center due to each of the 4 sides of the square. You ll draw 4 vectors and then you ll have to argue how they cancel out in pairs. And then you ll conclude that the E-field at the center is indeed zero.
 
Delta2 said:
try to draw the electric field vectors at the center due to each of the 4 sides of the square. You ll draw 4 vectors and then you ll have to argue how they cancel out in pairs.
I've been thinking the same thing from the beginning. I'll solve this by this way, I hope it works for getting some point :) Thank you for attention.
 
requied said:
Yeah it is obvious but I must attach an explain and show the calculations. Have you any offer to do it by this way? Or maybe a figure which can explain.
You can use the symmetry in your equations. There is no need to solve any integral. Just write the integrals down and collect up terms that cancel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K