Electric Field Between Three Point Charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field vector at the position of charge B in a system of three point charges, where q_{A}=4q_{C} and r_{1}=2r_{2}. The participants derive the electric field due to charges A and C, leading to the expression for the electric field at charge B as E=\frac{q_{c}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{-3 dr}{r^{2}(r-dr)}. The key challenge addressed is the algebraic manipulation required to arrive at the correct expression and the justification for neglecting higher-order terms in dr.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly limits and differential notation
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation and simplification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from point charges using Coulomb's law
  • Learn about vector calculus applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of limits and infinitesimals in calculus
  • Review algebraic techniques for simplifying complex expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and point charge interactions.

CoffeeCrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. Compute the electric field vector at the position of charge B for the case where q_{A}=4q_{C} and r_{1}=2r_{2}

2. Suppose that all three charge are positive and that q_{A}=4q_{C}. Consider the case where f q_{B} is moved to the right by a distance dr.
Now r_{1} = 2r+dr and r_{2}=r-dr. Find the electric field vector in terms of q_{C},r,dr and \epsilon_{0} and deduce the direction in which q_{b} will move.

13zpifp.png


Homework Equations



\overrightarrow{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\frac{q}{r^{2}}\hat{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



Part 1 is simple, put everything in terms of r_{2} and q_{c} and add the field due to each charge as vectors\overrightarrow{E}_{b} = \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}(\frac {4q_{c}}{4r^{2}_{2}} - \frac {q_{c}} {r^{2}_{2}}) \hat{i}
\overrightarrow{E}_{b} = 0 \hat{i}

Part 2 is where I'm a little stuck. I try to find the field due to charge A and C as before:

\overrightarrow{E}_{b} = \frac{q_{c}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}(\frac{4}{(2r+dr)^{2}}-\frac {1} {(r-dr)^{2}}) \hat{i}

The given answer is:

E=\frac{q_{c}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{-3 dr}{r^{2}(r-dr)}

But no matter how much I manipulate my expression, I can't seem to get anything very close to it. It just gets messier and messier.
I guess I'd just like to ask if my initial expression is correct and I'm just messing up the algebra, or if I've missed something conceptual, or if I have yet a different problem.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get something that resembles the answer, but not exactly. Distance of A r + dr , B r/2 - dr. Dropped the subsequent dr2 terms.
 
I'm sorry, but why did you need to consider A and B rather than A and C? I figured I'd have to find the electric field due to A at a distance of 2r+dr, due to C at a distance of r-dr and sum them? Also why were you able to drop the subsequent dr^{2} terms? i figured that despite differential notation being used, nowhere in the problem statement did they actually say the displacement was infinitesimal so I wasn't confident discarding dr terms.
I realized I didn't actually include where I got to with the algebra in my original post, so here it is:

\frac {q_{c}} {4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac {-3(4r-dr)dr} {(r-d)^{2}(2r+d)^2}

I can then force out an r^{2} term as in the given solution, but still, terms not in the given solution remain.

Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it.
 
Sorry I meant C. I thought that it is implied by the dr notation that one should consider it to be very small increments in r. Squaring these would then tender them even smaller. It is common practice to drop such squared terms then in further equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CoffeeCrow
Oh of course! Thank you so much, I worked through the algebra again, removing all dr terms to the second or greater power and I came up with the provided solution exactly. I suppose I was just worried that I'd made a conceptual error about the electric field somewhere along the way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
999
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
821
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K