B Electric Field Created by 2 Infinite Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the electric field generated by two infinite parallel plates using Gauss's law. The electric field from a single plate is given by E = σ/(2ε₀), and when considering two plates, the fields between them cancel each other out, resulting in a net electric field of zero. Outside the plates, the fields add constructively, leading to a total electric field of E = σ/ε₀. The principle of superposition applies, as electric fields from different sources combine due to the linearity of Maxwell's equations. This approach effectively demonstrates the behavior of electric fields in the presence of multiple charged plates.
Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Today, I watched a video about electric field created by an infinite plate by Khan Academy. They were talking about the clever application of the Gauss's law in this case (the cylinder method), so I wondered if I could apply the same thing but to 2 plates. For example, let's say that the plates are parallel. In this case the electric field created by one plate is ##E = \frac {\sigma}{2\epsilon_o}##. Since electric field is a vector quantity we can vectorially add up the electric field created by both plates. Between the plates the electric field created by one plate is opposite and equal to the electric field created by the other, thus if we vectorially add them up, we get 0. But on the left and right side, it's different. They have the same direction and magnitude at each point in space, thus the electric field at any point is ##E = \frac {\sigma}{\epsilon_o}##. Is this the correct way to think about this problem? (both plates have the same charge ##q##)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, electric fields generated from different sources add up to a superposition of the individual contributions. However, note that this is a result of the linearity of the governing differential equation, ie Gauss’ law or ultimately Maxwell’s equations. It does not follow solely from being a vector field.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top