Electric field discontinuity in a spherical shell?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field behavior in a spherical shell with a non-uniform charge distribution, particularly focusing on whether the electric field is discontinuous at the surface of the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Gauss's law regarding electric fields inside and outside the spherical shell, questioning the continuity of the electric field at the surface. Some participants reference the behavior of electric fields in relation to charged planes and insulators, while others consider the effects of polarization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants presenting various viewpoints on the continuity of the electric field. Some suggest that the electric field should be continuous, while others raise questions about the conditions under which discontinuities might occur, particularly in relation to the material properties of the shell.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of assumptions regarding the charge distribution and the nature of the shell (insulator vs. conductor), as well as the implications of spherical symmetry on the electric field components.

twist.1995
Messages
7
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Lets say, there is a non-uniform charge distribution, given as
upload_2016-8-30_20-19-3.png
in a spherical shell that has a cavity with radius a and the radius b to the outer surface. I am wondering if the field is discontinuous just on the surface of this sphere.

Homework Equations

http://blob:https://www.physicsforums.com/94bddccf-abed-4c26-bd7c-fdd42ade2eca [/B]
Φ=∫E.da=Q/ε0

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the infinitely charged plane with a surface charge density σ is discontinuous.
upload_2016-8-30_20-48-9.png

I am wondering if this is true for any surfaces regardless of shape and size.

Using Gauss' law, I obtained
upload_2016-8-30_20-53-14.png
, which does not say anything about the discontinuity at b.
Also, if I slice a tiny portion of the outer surface, will I be able to get a surface charge density since the charge is symmetrically distributed all over the shell?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
no electric field inside the shell, no charge enclosed...
 
Dr Transport said:
no electric field inside the shell, no charge enclosed...
The shell is an insulator, since there is a non-uniform volume charge density. If it was a conductor, there will be no charge inside the shell, and it will all be distributed on the inner and outer surfaces. Therefore, the integral gives the electric field inside the shell, as I have mentioned previously.
I am interested in what the electric field is on the surface just outside the sphere. I took the infinitely charged plane as an example and found that the electric field emanating outwards in the normal direction to the plane is σ/ε0. I need to know what will happen on the surface of the sphere (spherical shell),- can I consider it as an infinite plane with a constant electric field on the surface patch on it will take the value of what the Gauss' law gave me. In other words, I found that the electric field is continuous everywhere (not inside the cavity), but is it continuous just on the surface of the sphere or not?
 
you need to check Gauss's law inside the cavity of sphere, you enclose no charge, so there is no electric field...
 
Why would it be discontinuous? Just use Gauss's law at r = just inside b and just outside b. Same E field!
 
rude man said:
Why would it be discontinuous?
If the shell is an insulator (assumed to be a linear, isotropic and homogeneous dielectric), is it not true that the normal component of ## \vec D ## (not ## \vec E ##) is continuous while the tangential component of ## \vec E ## is continuous? In that case
$$ \epsilon \vec{E}_{inside} \cdot \hat n= \epsilon_0 \vec{E}_{outside} \cdot \hat n $$
If there is spherical symmetry, there is no tangential component, but there is still discontinuity in the normal component of the electric field. The surface polarization causes the discontinuity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: twist.1995
kuruman said:
If the shell is an insulator (assumed to be a linear, isotropic and homogeneous dielectric), is it not true that the normal component of ## \vec D ## (not ## \vec E ##) is continuous while the tangential component of ## \vec E ## is continuous? In that case
$$ \epsilon \vec{E}_{inside} \cdot \hat n= \epsilon_0 \vec{E}_{outside} \cdot \hat n $$
If there is spherical symmetry, there is no tangential component, but there is still discontinuity in the normal component of the electric field. The surface polarization causes the discontinuity.
Only if there is polarization to begin with. There was no mention in the problem statement that the relative dielectric coefficient was > 1 so the E field is the same inside and outside the sphere at r=b.

If there is polarization your statement is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
868
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K