Electric Field Forces in a Hydrogen Molecule

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving electric fields and forces within a hypothetical hydrogen molecule model. The scenario describes a sphere filled with negative charge and the placement of protons within this charge distribution to achieve zero net force on the protons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Gauss's Law in the context of a uniformly charged sphere and the conditions necessary for the forces on the protons to cancel. Questions arise regarding the placement of protons and the resulting electric fields.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the electric field contributions from both the negative charge and the protons. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for the protons to be positioned in a way that their fields counteract the field from the negative charge.

Contextual Notes

There is ongoing uncertainty about the correct application of Gauss's Law and the resultant electric fields, with participants noting potential errors in calculations and assumptions about charge distributions.

asiangrrl
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Well, I did the problem. The problem is I KNOW my answer is wrong. Anybody have any idea why? (This is what I've worked out with my friend).

Homework Statement



Imagine a sphere of radius a filled with negative charge of uniform density, the total charge being equivalent to that of two electrons. Imbed in this jelly of negative charge two protons and assume that in spite of their presence the negative charge distribution remains uniform. Where must the protons be located so that the force on each of them is zero? (This is a surprisingly realistic caricature of a hydrogen molecule; the magic that keeps the electron cloud in the molecule from collapsing around the protons is explained by quantum mechanics!)

[Ahhhh logically when I try to think about this, I don't understand how there's ANY way there could be zero force on the protons in a sphere of negative electric charge. But that's non-mathematical.]

Homework Equations



Gauss's Law (sphere)
E = \frac{Q}{r^2}
q = e (charge of an electron)
a = radius of sphere
r = radius of Gaussian sphere

The Attempt at a Solution



So, supposedly, I'm supposed to take a Gaussian surface/sphere within the sphere on which the charges will rest.

The charge density of the sphere is
\frac{-2q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi a^3}
or \frac{-3q}{2\pi a^3}.

Therefore the charge on my Gaussian sphere is the charge density times the volume of the Gaussian sphere, or
(\frac{-3q}{2\pi a^3})(\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3)
=\frac{2qr^3}{a^3}

E = q_total/r^2
Total charge is 2 electrons - charge inside Gaussian sphere
q_{total} = 2q - \frac{2qr^3}{a^3}
E = \frac{1}{r^2}(2q - \frac{2qr^3}{a^3}
E = \frac{2q}{r^2} - \frac{2qr}{a^3}

When the E field is equal to zero, there is no force.

0 = \frac{2q}{r^2} - \frac{2qr}{a^3}
\frac{2q}{r^2} = \frac{2qr}{a^3}
r^3 = a^3
r = a

The more I look at this the more it doesn't make sense, but I can't pinpoint where the "wrong" is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asiangrrl said:
Well, I did the problem. The problem is I KNOW my answer is wrong. Anybody have any idea why? (This is what I've worked out with my friend).

Homework Statement



Imagine a sphere of radius a filled with negative charge of uniform density, the total charge being equivalent to that of two electrons. Imbed in this jelly of negative charge two protons and assume that in spite of their presence the negative charge distribution remains uniform. Where must the protons be located so that the force on each of them is zero? (This is a surprisingly realistic caricature of a hydrogen molecule; the magic that keeps the electron cloud in the molecule from collapsing around the protons is explained by quantum mechanics!)

[Ahhhh logically when I try to think about this, I don't understand how there's ANY way there could be zero force on the protons in a sphere of negative electric charge. But that's non-mathematical.]

Homework Equations



Gauss's Law (sphere)
E = \frac{Q}{r^2}
q = e (charge of an electron)
a = radius of sphere
r = radius of Gaussian sphere

The Attempt at a Solution



So, supposedly, I'm supposed to take a Gaussian surface/sphere within the sphere on which the charges will rest.

The charge density of the sphere is
\frac{-2q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi a^3}
or \frac{-3q}{2\pi a^3}.

Therefore the charge on my Gaussian sphere is the charge density times the volume of the Gaussian sphere, or
(\frac{-3q}{2\pi a^3})(\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3)
=\frac{2qr^3}{a^3}

so far this looks good. seems like you forgot a minus sign at the end.

E = q_total/r^2
Total charge is 2 electrons - charge inside Gaussian sphere
q_{total} = 2q - \frac{2qr^3}{a^3}
E = \frac{1}{r^2}(2q - \frac{2qr^3}{a^3}
E = \frac{2q}{r^2} - \frac{2qr}{a^3}

I don't understand why you did this. The field is the total "enclosed charge" divided by r^2... why are you taking 2q and subtracting...

Find the field due to the electrons... taking the above into account.

Now we know that the field due to the electrons is in the radial direction... so the only way that the protons can be placed in the field motionless, if the field that the proton creates a field in the radial direction...

how must the protons be placed to cancel the field due to the electrons?
 
correction: So is the field due to the electrons with just E = (-\frac{2qr^3}{a^2})(\frac{1}{r^2}) = -\frac{2qr}{a^3}

I really have no idea how the protons can cancel the electrons unless they were at the same point? Is there any other hint you could give? Thanks again :(
 
Last edited:
asiangrrl said:
correction: So is the field due to the electrons with just E = (-\frac{2qr^3}{a^2})(\frac{1}{r^2}) = -\frac{2qr}{a^3}

I really have no idea how the protons can cancel the electrons unless they were at the same point? Is there any other hint you could give? Thanks again :(

Since the field due to the electrons acts radially... the field due to the protons needs to act radially too...

The protons have to be located opposite each other. ie both protons are located at a radius r from the center opposite each other...

So what's the field at one of the protons? You've got the field due to the electrons + the field due to the other proton. The 2 need to add to zero...
 
Hmm, I think I am starting to see it. Since the proton will be on the Gaussian sphere at radius r away, for a proton E = \frac{q}{r^2}.

So
E = -\frac{2qr}{a^3} + \frac{q}{r^2} = 0?
 
asiangrrl said:
Hmm, I think I am starting to see it. Since the proton will be on the Gaussian sphere at radius r away, for a proton E = \frac{q}{r^2}.

So
E = -\frac{2qr}{a^3} + \frac{q}{r^2} = 0?

yes, except the field due to the proton will be:

E = \frac{q}{(2r)^2}

so set:

E = -\frac{2qr}{a^3} + \frac{q}{(2r)^2} = 0[/QUOTE]
 
Ah, 2r since it's a diameter away. Thank you so, so much. I think I understand this now. Yay for starting to get E&M :).
 
asiangrrl said:
Ah, 2r since it's a diameter away. Thank you so, so much. I think I understand this now. Yay for starting to get E&M :).

:) no prob.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
4K