B Electric Field Inside a Hollow Sphere

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heisenberg7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electric field inside a hollow, non-conducting sphere with small holes at opposite ends. It is established that for small holes, the electric field inside can be considered zero, similar to a complete hollow sphere. However, as the size of the holes increases, the electric field inside the sphere becomes non-negligible and is influenced by the holes' dimensions. The scenario involves a uniformly charged sphere with an external charge approaching one of the holes, and the focus is on how long this charge spends inside the sphere. Ultimately, the small holes are primarily intended to allow the external charge to pass through without significantly altering the electric field inside.
Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Let's assume that we have a hollow sphere with holes at opposite ends of the diameter. What would be the field inside the hollow sphere? I know that we can look at this as the superposition of the hollow sphere without holes and 2 patches with opposite surface charge density. For some reason, in my book, they say that the electric field inside is zero. No explanation. I mean sure, the electric field from the hollow sphere without holes is zero, but what about the patches? Wouldn't they create a field inside the hollow sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We need more information. Is the sphere a conductor? Does the sphere carry any charge? If so, how is the charge distributed? Are there any charges external to the sphere? How big are the holes? What is the specific example that is being discussed in your book? What book are you using?
 
TSny said:
We need more information. Is the sphere a conductor? Does the sphere carry any charge? If so, how is the charge distributed? Are there any charges external to the sphere? How big are the holes? What is the specific example that is being discussed in your book? What book are you using?
It's an insulator. Assume that charge is uniformly distributed across its surface and that it has a surface charge density ##+\sigma##. There is an external charge that's travelling towards one hole. Assume that they are small (also, what happens as the radius of the holes increases?). The specific example that is being discussed in my book is this one:

Inside a hollow, nonconducting, uniformly charged sphere of mass ##m_1## and radius ##r##, at the ends of one of the diameters we carve out 2 small holes. The charge of the sphere is ##q_1##. At the start of the composition, the sphere is at rest and far away from it a charge of mass ##m_2## and charge ##q_2## starts travelling towards it with speed ##v_0##. Charges ##q_1## and ##q_2## are of the same sign and the charge is travelling towards one of the holes and we want it to exit on the other side. How much time will the charge spend inside the sphere? Assume that there is no friction.

The book I'm using was written in another language so it wouldn't be of much help to you if I mentioned which one it is.
 
Thank you for clarifying the setup. I feel pretty sure that by calling the two holes "small", it is intended that you may take the electric field inside the sphere (due to the surface charge) to be essentially the same as if there were no holes.
 
TSny said:
Thank you for clarifying the setup. I feel pretty sure that by calling the two holes "small", it is intended that you may take the electric field inside the sphere (due to the surface charge) to be essentially the same as if there were no holes.
Oh, great. So, if the holes were larger, the effect would be larger? Could this be illustrated by for example slowly increasing the radius of the holes to the point at which the sphere slowly becomes a 1 dimensional ring? It just seems more intuitive that way.
 
Heisenberg7 said:
Oh, great. So, if the holes were larger, the effect would be larger? Could this be illustrated by for example slowly increasing the radius of the holes to the point at which the sphere slowly becomes a 1 dimensional ring? It just seems more intuitive that way.
Yes. For non-negligible-sized holes, there will be some electric field inside the sphere that depends on the size of the holes. Also, the field outside the sphere is modified by the holes.

In this problem, the holes are assumed to be small enough that you can neglect these complications. The small holes exist only to allow the charge ##q## to pass through the interior of the hollow sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes Heisenberg7
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top