Electric field of a long round bar

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


I have to prove that the electric field round a long conductive round bar of radius R is equal to that of a long thin wire, meaning the charge is on the center line

Homework Equations


The Gauss theorem:
##E\times A=q##
Where A is the area of the surface and q is the charge enclosed in it

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the field E when the charge is concentrated on the axis i take a round long volume with radius r:
##E\times 2\pi rl=\lambda l\rightarrow E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi r}##
Where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the charge per unit length.
The field near a round bar:
##E\times 2\pi rl=\sigma\cdot 2\pi R l##
Where [itex]\sigma[/itex] is the charge per unit surface, since the charge is concentrated only on the surface.
But [itex]\sigma\cdot 2\pi R l=\lambda l[/itex]
They both are the charge per unit length. and so is if i use the charge per unit mass.
I feel uncomfortable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Karol said:

Homework Statement


I have to prove that the electric field round a long conductive round bar of radius R is equal to that of a long thin wire, meaning the charge is on the center line

Homework Equations


The Gauss theorem:
##E\times A=q##
Where A is the area of the surface and q is the charge enclosed in it

It is true if you use cgs system of units where ε0=1.

Karol said:

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the field E when the charge is concentrated on the axis i take a round long volume with radius r:
##E\times 2\pi rl=\lambda l\rightarrow E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi r}##
Where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the charge per unit length.

Correct.

Karol said:
The field near a round bar:
##E\times 2\pi rl=\sigma\cdot 2\pi R l##
Where [itex]\sigma[/itex] is the charge per unit surface, since the charge is concentrated only on the surface.
But [itex]\sigma\cdot 2\pi R l=\lambda l[/itex]
Simplifying, you get that E=σ R/r and σ =λ/(2πR). Substitute the second equation into the first, what do you get? Is E the same as in case of a thin long wire at the centre?
 
I get ##E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi r}## like for a long thin wire at the center, and that's good, but i feel uncomfortable with that, is that the method to prove it?
 
You do not need to feel uncomfortable, it was the right proof. :) Good job!