Electric field of a semi circle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field of a uniformly charged semi-circle can be calculated using the formula E = 2kQ/(πa²). The charge dq is defined as Q/(πa) dl, where dl = a dθ, allowing integration over the arc instead of a straight line. The contributions of all infinitesimal charges along the semi-circle are summed, with the x-components canceling out and only the y-components contributing to the total electric field. This approach clarifies the necessity of integrating with respect to the angle θ rather than the x-coordinate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of charge distribution concepts, particularly linear charge density
  • Ability to apply trigonometric identities in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of polar coordinates in integration
  • Explore the concept of linear charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the use of vector calculus in calculating electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in advanced electrostatics and integration techniques in physics.

madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/2786/21417885.png
[96]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



E= kdq/r^2
dq=Q/(pi a) dx
Ex = 0 , Ey= E sintheta
sin theta = sqrt(a^2 - x^2)/a by Pythagorean theorem
Ey = kQ/(pi a* a^3) integral from -a to a sqrt(a^2 - x^2)dx
= kQ/(pi a^4) *pi a^2/2= kQ/2a^2 but in the manual it says E= 2kQ/pi*a^2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You could try an integral in function of \theta.
 
but I already did it as a function of x why was that wrong?
I think that is ok because every point in the semi circle can be expressed by the x cooridnate
 
Last edited:
any help?
 
madah12 said:
dq=Q/(pi a) dx
Ex = 0 , Ey= E sintheta
sin theta = sqrt(a^2 - x^2)/a by Pythagorean theorem
Ey = kQ/(pi a* a^3) integral from -a to a sqrt(a^2 - x^2)dx
= kQ/(pi a^4) *pi a^2/2= kQ/2a^2 but in the manual it says E= 2kQ/pi*a^2

Your dq means uniform charge distribution along x; but it is uniform along the arc. dq=Q/(pi a) (a dtheta). Integrate wit respect to theta. ehild
 
Ey = Q/(pi a * a^2) integral from 0 to pi a*sin theta d theta
= -Q/(pi a^2) (-1-1) = 2Q/(pi*a^2)
 
Do not forget k.

ehild
 
oh ok but so if we are not integrating along the x-axis then are integrating along the circle?

but how can we know that dq= Q/(pi a) (a dtheta) represents integration over the arc? I did it because you said that it did but I don't understand it.
 
what I am asking is that how can I know what dq is if I am not integrating over a straight line
I mean I was never taught how to integrate over a curved line.
 
  • #10
You are integrating over the semi-circle because you are varying the angle. Every infinitesimal charge dQ will have a different angle in relation to the point P, so you have to count it.

So:

dQ = \lambda dl
dl = r d \theta

\lambda = \frac{Q}{l}

(lambda is the linear density.)
 
  • #11
The problem said that the charge is uniformly distributed along the semicircle. It means that a tiny piece of the arc of length dl has the charge dq=Q/(pi a) dl. But the length of arc is proportional to the angle in radians: dl = radius times angle,
dl = a*d(theta).
You know that the integration variable can be changed. It is easier to integrate along the length of arc than along x.

All the dq charges along the semicircle contribute to the electric field at the centre, and you have to sum up their contributions.
All these little charges belong to a certain angle theta and their electric field is parallel to the radius. The x components cancel and the y components are kdq/a^2 sin(theta). Replace dq by Q/(pi a)* dl, dl by a*dtheta, and instead of the sum, you do integration.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K