Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Disc at Large Distances

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field of a uniformly charged disc with radius a and surface charge density σ at large distances (x >> a) is given by the equation E = (σ / (2ε))(1 - (1 / √((a²/x²) + 1))). The initial assumption that the field approaches zero was incorrect; instead, the field remains small but non-zero. The correct approach involves using a binomial approximation to accurately evaluate the expression for E without neglecting the small parameter a/x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus and limits
  • Knowledge of binomial approximation techniques
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, including surface charge density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the binomial approximation in physics problems
  • Explore electric field calculations for different charge distributions
  • Learn about the implications of electric fields in electrostatics
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields at varying distances from charged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators looking for clear explanations of electric field concepts related to charged discs.

whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


What is the field of a disc radius a, uniformly charged with surface charge density σ, for x>>a?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've worked out the equation for the field of a disc:
##E = ## ##\frac{\sigma x}{2 \epsilon}## ##\frac{\sqrt{a^2+x^2}-x}{x \sqrt{a^2+x^2}}##

I'm also given a hint, which is that the answer shouldn't be zero. As far as I can tell, if x>>a, this definitely becomes zero! I have looked up my answer for E and it is right. To work out E for x>>a, I essentially ignored all a as irrelevant - is that wrong?

##E = ## ##\frac{\sigma x}{2 \epsilon}## ##\frac{\sqrt{x^2}-x}{x \sqrt{x^2}}## is most definitely zero!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a finite value of ##x## that is much greater than ##a##, ##E## will be small but it won't be zero. You have "over approximated". In this type of problem, you want to keep the lowest order nonzero approximation.

Instead of approximating ##\sqrt{x^2+a^2}## in the numerator as ##\sqrt{x^2}##, find a more accurate approximation in terms of the small quantity ##a/x##.
Hint: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_approximation

You might find it easier to first simplify your expression for E by cancelling some ##x##'s and splitting the fraction involving the square roots into the difference of two fractions. You will then have only one square root to worry about.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: whatisreality
Simplifying the expression gives

##E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon}(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{a^2}{x^2}+1}})##
And then use a binomial approximation for ##\sqrt{\frac{a^2}{x^2}+1}##.
Thank you, gave the right answer :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
896
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
764
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K