Electric field with dielectric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field along the axis of a ring with radius R and a uniform linear charge density λ, which includes both free and polarization charges, in a dielectric medium characterized by εr. The electric field E' in the dielectric is determined by the relationship E' = E/εr, where E is the electric field without the dielectric. The participants confirm that it is valid to use the formula for E while considering the contributions from both types of charges, and they emphasize the importance of integrating the contributions from the entire ring to find the resultant electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, including Coulomb's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields in dielectric materials
  • Learn about the Pythagorean theorem application in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of polarization charges in dielectrics
  • Investigate the integration of charge distributions in cylindrical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in electrostatics and dielectric materials analysis.

chrishans
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a ring of radius R with linear uniform charge density \lambda=constant (which includes both free charges and polarization charges). The ring is in a dielectric region with \varepsilon_r. I have to find the electric field on any point of the axis of the ring

Homework Equations


\vec E=\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually don't know and coulnd't find anywhere if I can calculate the electric field using the above formula when \lambda includes free AND polarization charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a coefficient missing in your equation ?
 
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
 
Since the ring is submerged in a dielectric region with εr, the Electric field decreases by a factor of εr.
So E' = E/εr, where E is the magnitude of the field without the dielectric, and E' with dielectric.
Now take an infinitely small section on the circumference on the ring, dl. The charge associated is dq=λdl.
The field associated with dq is 1/4piε (dq/r^2). However, since the ring is symmetric, the x-component of the net electric field, which is perpendicular to the axis, cancels out. Now all you need to consider is the y component. The y component of the field is Ey= E'cos(theta), where theta is the angle made between the axis, and the field vector coming from dq. Set "z" as the distance along the axis from the center of the circle. You can find cos(theta) using a relationship between "z" and "R", with the use of pythagorean theorem. Also, when you intergrate with respect to dl, change dl to Rd(theta). Integrate all contributions of dq from 0 to 2pi (because it is a circle) and you should be able to find the electric field anywhere along the axis. I understand that this is a sloppy description, but I hope this help anyways.
 
It should be fine to calculate it treating it as free charges, because your density does include polarization charges.
 
chrishans said:
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
Strange. i seem to remember that
\vec E= {1\over 4\pi\epsilon_0}\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}in vacuum. In a medium it would be ##{1\over 4\pi\epsilon}## with ##\epsilon=\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r##, but I could be mistaken. So check.
There is nothing in ##\lambda## that has to do with stuff outside the ring. No change in ##\lambda##, whatever ##\epsilon_r##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K