Electric field with dielectric

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field along the axis of a ring with a uniform linear charge density in a dielectric medium. The charge density includes both free and polarization charges, and participants are exploring how this affects the electric field calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether the electric field can be calculated using a given formula when the charge density includes both free and polarization charges. There is also discussion about the impact of the dielectric constant on the electric field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the electric field and the dielectric constant, suggesting that the electric field decreases by a factor of the dielectric constant. Others are clarifying the assumptions regarding the treatment of charge densities and the applicability of the electric field formula in this context.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the coefficient of the dielectric and the proper treatment of the charge density in the calculations. Participants are also reflecting on the differences between calculations in vacuum versus in a dielectric medium.

chrishans
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a ring of radius R with linear uniform charge density \lambda=constant (which includes both free charges and polarization charges). The ring is in a dielectric region with \varepsilon_r. I have to find the electric field on any point of the axis of the ring

Homework Equations


\vec E=\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually don't know and coulnd't find anywhere if I can calculate the electric field using the above formula when \lambda includes free AND polarization charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a coefficient missing in your equation ?
 
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
 
Since the ring is submerged in a dielectric region with εr, the Electric field decreases by a factor of εr.
So E' = E/εr, where E is the magnitude of the field without the dielectric, and E' with dielectric.
Now take an infinitely small section on the circumference on the ring, dl. The charge associated is dq=λdl.
The field associated with dq is 1/4piε (dq/r^2). However, since the ring is symmetric, the x-component of the net electric field, which is perpendicular to the axis, cancels out. Now all you need to consider is the y component. The y component of the field is Ey= E'cos(theta), where theta is the angle made between the axis, and the field vector coming from dq. Set "z" as the distance along the axis from the center of the circle. You can find cos(theta) using a relationship between "z" and "R", with the use of pythagorean theorem. Also, when you intergrate with respect to dl, change dl to Rd(theta). Integrate all contributions of dq from 0 to 2pi (because it is a circle) and you should be able to find the electric field anywhere along the axis. I understand that this is a sloppy description, but I hope this help anyways.
 
It should be fine to calculate it treating it as free charges, because your density does include polarization charges.
 
chrishans said:
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
Strange. i seem to remember that
\vec E= {1\over 4\pi\epsilon_0}\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}in vacuum. In a medium it would be ##{1\over 4\pi\epsilon}## with ##\epsilon=\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r##, but I could be mistaken. So check.
There is nothing in ##\lambda## that has to do with stuff outside the ring. No change in ##\lambda##, whatever ##\epsilon_r##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K