Electric Potential and Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around electric potential and kinetic energy in the context of charged particles. Participants explore the relationships between electric potential differences and kinetic energy changes as particles move through electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the electric potential difference and its relation to kinetic energy, questioning the signs and values of potential energy. There is also an exploration of how to calculate the kinetic energy of a charged particle moving through different electric potentials.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided equations and insights into the relationships between electric potential and kinetic energy. Others are seeking clarification on concepts and calculations, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings regarding the application of formulas and the interpretation of electric potential in relation to kinetic energy. There are indications of confusion about units and the correct setup of equations for multiple charges.

TAMUwbEE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged particle (q = -8.0 mC), which moves in a region where the only force acting on the particle is an electric force, is released from rest at point A. At point B the kinetic energy of the particle is equal to 4.8 J. What is the electric potential difference VB-VA?

Homework Equations


EPE = Delta V (volts) = Delta U (potential energy) / q0

The Attempt at a Solution


Using this equation, I came up with the solution of -.6 kV, however, the answer is positive. Why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which point do you think is at a higher potential ?
 
Ahhh. Point VB has higher potential energy, therefore, in the equation VB - VA, it is positive. Thank you for your response.

I also have another question.

A particle (charge = +2.0 mC) moving in a region where only electric forces act on it has a kinetic energy of 5.0 J at point A. The particle subsequently passes through point B which has an electric potential of +1.5 kV relative to point A. Determine the kinetic energy of the particle as it moves through point B.

I'll be honest with you, I do not know where to start with this problem. I know my equations however, I cannot picture the concept of potential energy caused by an electric field in relative to points A and B. If someone could clarify I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.
 
Simply , q*ΔV = ΔKE .
 
Thanks again Qwerty. I must have missed out on that equation when I was copying my notes.
 

Homework Statement


Identical point charges (+50 μC) are placed at the corners of a square with sides of 2.0-m length. How much external energy is required to bring a fifth identical charge from infinity to the geometric center of the square?

Homework Equations


Electric Potential for Multiple Charges

ΔU = K∑(Qi / Ri)
Therefore,
K(50x10^-6 C) / 2cos(45°) yields 3.17 x 10^5 V.

The Attempt at a Solution


Each point charge by itself has an electric potential of 3.17 x 10^5 V (V is the correct unit, right?).

However, I'm sure I'm doing this wrong because my answer choices are in a completely different magnitude (10^1).

Thanks for the help.
 
TAMUwbEE said:
ΔU = K∑(Qi / Ri)

ΔU = K∑(Qi*Q/Ri) .

Also , I think you haven't inputted Ri correctly either .
 
What should the equation be then for all 4 charges?

K(Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4) / 2cos(45)?

Also, what would Ri be then?
 
Ri equals distance between any charge and the new charge ( Use diagram ) .

KQ(Q1 + Q2 + .. ) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TAMUwbEE
  • #10
Qwertywerty said:
ΔU = K∑(Qi*Q/Ri) .

Also , I think you haven't inputted Ri correctly either .
Are you sure? sqrt(2) looks right to me.
TAMUwbEE, I'm not sure whether you have understood Qwertywerty's other point. You calculated 3.17 x 10^5 V (as the potential due to one existing charge). You are asked for an energy, not a potential. That explains the orders of magnitude discrepancy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TAMUwbEE
  • #11
haruspex said:
Are you sure? sqrt(2) looks right to me.

Then that's my mistake .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K