Electric potential at the vertex of a triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at vertex P of a right triangle with a uniform surface charge density σ. The potential at P is derived using the formula $$\phi_P= (σb/4π \varepsilon_o)ln[(1+sinθ)/cosθ]$$. The initial approach involved integrating the contributions from vertical strips, but the user encountered issues due to misinterpretation of angle θ and height representation. The correct method requires expressing the height of the strip in terms of a fixed angle and using polar coordinates for integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and surface charge density
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications in geometry
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, particularly related to line charges
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from a line of charge
  • Learn about polar coordinates and their application in integration
  • Explore the concept of surface charge density in electrostatics
  • Investigate the relationship between angles and dimensions in geometric configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electrostatics, electrical engineering, and applied mathematics, will benefit from this discussion.

math4everyone
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
I am stuck with this problem:

The right triangle shown with vertex P at the origin has base b, altitude a, and uniform density of surface charge σ. Determine the potential at the vertex P. First find the contribution of the vertical strip of width dx at x. Show that the potential at P can be written as $$\phi_P= (σb/4π \varepsilon_o)ln[(1+sinθ)/cosθ]$$
MaW6n.png

What I have done so far:

A tiny box of the strip has width dx and height $$rd\theta$$ so its contribution to P is
\begin{equation}
d\phi = \frac{(\sigma)(dx)(rd\theta)}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o r}=\frac{(\sigma)(dx)(d\theta)}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o }
\end{equation}
So the contribution of the entire strip would be
\begin{equation}
\frac{\sigma dx}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o}\int_0^{arctan(\frac{a}{b})} d\theta = \frac{\sigma dx}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o} arctan(\frac{a}{b})
\end{equation}
So the potential, $$\phi$$ would be:
\begin{equation}
\phi = \frac{\sigma}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o} arctan(\frac{a}{b}) \int_0^b dx = b\frac{\sigma}{4 \pi \varepsilon_o} arctan(\frac{a}{b})
\end{equation}
But this is clearly not the answer. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the drawing. Angle θ is fixed, so dθ has no meaning here. The height of the strip is better represented as y and the area element as dA = y dx. Then express y in terms of x (it's a straight line) and integrate. Of course, first you need to find the potential of a line of charge of length y at perpendicular distance x from one of its ends.
 
math4everyone said:
A tiny box of the strip has width dx and height $$rd\theta$$
As kuruman pointed out, ##\theta## is a fixed angle.

Maybe you were thinking of using a variable angle ##\varphi##, say, as shown in the attached figure below.
But, note that the height, ##dy##, of the small box is not equal to ##r d\varphi##.

Can you see how to express ##dy## in terms of ##r d\varphi## and an appropriate trig function of ##\varphi##? If so, then you can let the integration variable for the vertical strip be ##\varphi## and it should simplify nicely.
 

Attachments

  • Strip geometry.png
    Strip geometry.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 887
You probably could see the area of your element as dydx and integrate your potential function over the entire surface (one tip: try using polar coordinates).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
632
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K