Electric Potential Between Two Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around electric potential in the context of two point charges: a positive charge of +q and a negative charge of -2q. The original poster seeks to understand the concept of electric potential at various points in space, particularly where the potential is zero between the two charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the conceptual meaning of zero electric potential and how a positive test charge can have no potential energy at certain points between the charges. They explore the implications of having points of zero potential in relation to the positions of the charges.
  • Participants discuss the arbitrary nature of reference points for electric potential and potential energy, and the distinction between potential and potential energy.
  • There are analogies drawn between electric potential and gravitational potential, highlighting the complexities of understanding these concepts in different contexts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of electric potential and potential energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between potential and potential energy, but no consensus has been reached on the conceptual understanding of zero potential.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of negative charges on electric potential and the concept of bringing charges from infinity. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions and interpretations that remain to be clarified.

maw524
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a series of questions regarding electric potential at various points in space given various point charges. The one that would probably be best to focus on is a charge of +q and a second charge of -2q a distance "d" further along the x-axis, find the non-infinity points at which the electric potential due to the charges is zero.

The method isn't actually the issue, I can get a numerical answer. However: I have absolutely no idea what it means, conceptually. How can a positive test charge have no potential energy at some point between these charges? What is actually happening at the point between them at which the potential is zero? Why is there a point of zero potential to the left of the positive charge, one in between the two, but no point of zero potential to the right of the negative charge?

Homework Equations



V=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



As for why I don't understand:

With electric potential being thought of as the energy per charge at a point in space, I don't see how there can be a point between the two charges (considering that they are oppositely charged) at which any possible test charge would not have some potential energy. A positive placed anywhere between them would be pulled right toward the negative charge and have positive potential energy, and a negative charge placed anywhere between them would be pushed left toward the positive charge, and so would have negative potential energy (assuming left is negative).

As for looking at the electric potential as the energy used to bring a charge from infinity to that point, I, frankly, don't understand how that works with negative source charges. The further away from a negative source charge, the more potential energy a positive test charge would have. How does no potential at infinity work? At what point does its potential stop increasing and begin decreasing to zero. And how does the "bringing charges in from infinity" work with a charge placed between these two producing zero potential?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi maw524! welcome to pf! :smile:
maw524 said:
… I have absolutely no idea what it means, conceptually. How can a positive test charge have no potential energy at some point between these charges? What is actually happening at the point between them at which the potential is zero? Why is there a point of zero potential to the left of the positive charge, one in between the two, but no point of zero potential to the right of the negative charge?

With electric potential being thought of as the energy per charge at a point in space, I don't see how there can be a point between the two charges (considering that they are oppositely charged) at which any possible test charge would not have some potential energy. A positive placed anywhere between them would be pulled right toward the negative charge and have positive potential energy, and a negative charge placed anywhere between them would be pushed left toward the positive charge, and so would have negative potential energy (assuming left is negative).

zero potential doesn't really mean anything conceptually, it's an arbitrary concept of there being zero work done in moving the charge there from infinity …

and potential (or potential energy) has nothing to do with how a charge is pushed: that depends only on the gradient of the potential :wink:
 
Okay, so arbitrary how, exactly? Arbitrary like selected reference points vs other relative reference points?

It still means something though. V=U/q so in other words, the amount of potential energy per charge at that point in space. So how can there be a point between them with zero potential energy? It'd be like one planet and then a second planet twice as big and the first one has...negative gravity (not exactly a real-world analogy, but hopefully you get my point). At any point between the two, the small planet's oppo-gravity would give potential energy due to its push, and the big planet would provide negative potential because of it's even bigger pull.

To me, V=U/q seems like, going back to normal gravity for this analogy, the potential energy due to gravity, U=mgh, being viewed without a value for mass, and so in other words, "gh" per unit of mass. In this case, V is equivalent to "gh".

Just as "gh" would give a us a number representing the Joules of potential energy per kilogram placed at that height, so does "V" give us the number of Joules per charge placed at that point in space. How can there be a point between them where "V" is zero?
 
Hello maw.If a test charge is at a point where the potential is zero that doesn't mean that the potential energy is zero.
 
hi maw524! :smile:
maw524 said:
Okay, so arbitrary how, exactly? Arbitrary like selected reference points vs other relative reference points?

yes, arbitrary like any reference point
It still means something though. V=U/q so in other words, the amount of potential energy per charge at that point in space…

yes, but V and U use the same arbitrary reference point
To me, V=U/q seems like, going back to normal gravity for this analogy, the potential energy due to gravity, U=mgh, being viewed without a value for mass, and so in other words, "gh" per unit of mass. In this case, V is equivalent to "gh".

Just as "gh" would give a us a number representing the Joules of potential energy per kilogram placed at that height, so does "V" give us the number of Joules per charge placed at that point in space. How can there be a point between them where "V" is zero?

but with gravity, h = 0 is the arbitrary level that happens to be chosen for the particular diagram …

V gives the number of joules (small "j", btw, if you write it in full :wink:) for the work needed to get it to that point from the arbitrary reference level :smile:
Dadface said:
Hello maw.If a test charge is at a point where the potential is zero that doesn't mean that the potential energy is zero.


well, yes it does … using that particular reference level for energy, the PE is zero
 
Potential and potential energy are different things.If the potential at a point is zero then the the potential energy will be zero but only between that point and any other point or points where the potential is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K