Electric Potential Difference and charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential energy of four identical charges (+3.5 µC each) positioned 0.35 m apart. The user initially attempted to compute the potential energy using the formula U = kqq/r for all combinations of the charges but received incorrect results. A key insight provided was that the potential energy for each pair is counted twice, necessitating a division by two. Additionally, the user was reminded to ensure the correct distances and units were used in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and the formula U = kqq/r
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and charge interactions
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions, particularly microcoulombs (µC)
  • Ability to perform arithmetic operations with scalar quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of electric potential energy calculations
  • Learn about the significance of distance in charge interactions
  • Study the concept of unique combinations in physics problems
  • Practice unit conversions, especially for microcoulombs to coulombs
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in electrostatics calculations will benefit from this discussion.

chattkis3
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem I am having trouble with, even though i think it should be simple...

Four identical charges (+3.5uC each) are brought from infinity and fixed to a straight line. The charges are located .35m apart. Determine the electric potential energy of the group.

So I've tried two different approaches. First, I found every possible combination of the 4 charges (q1q2 q1q3 q1q4 q2q1 q2q3 q2q4 q3q1 q3q2 q3q4 q4q1 q4q2 q4q3) and used the equation U = kqq/r to find the potential for all 12 combos and found the sum of all 12 potentials. This didn't give me the right answer.

So then I tried just the combinations that were totally different (q1q2 q1q3 q1q4 q2q3 q2q4 q3q4) and found the sum of the potentials, and that did not give me the correct answer either...

Any comments? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chattkis3 said:
Here's the problem I am having trouble with, even though i think it should be simple...

Four identical charges (+3.5uC each) are brought from infinity and fixed to a straight line. The charges are located .35m apart. Determine the electric potential energy of the group.

So I've tried two different approaches. First, I found every possible combination of the 4 charges (q1q2 q1q3 q1q4 q2q1 q2q3 q2q4 q3q1 q3q2 q3q4 q4q1 q4q2 q4q3) and used the equation U = kqq/r to find the potential for all 12 combos and found the sum of all 12 potentials. This didn't give me the right answer.

You have the right idea here. However, notice that in the equation U = kqq/r it doesn't matter which charge comes first. ie: kq1q2/r = kq2q1/r so really what you did was count the potential twice for each pair of charges. so the correct answer, should be this answer divided by 2 (assuming everything else you did was correct ).

Another thing to watch out for is the distance r. notice that it is not equal for each pair of charges.

So then I tried just the combinations that were totally different (q1q2 q1q3 q1q4 q2q3 q2q4 q3q4) and found the sum of the potentials, and that did not give me the correct answer either...

Any comments? Thanks in advance
This should give you the right answer assuming that you account for the distances correcly. Anothering to check on is your units. did you use 10^-6C for \mu C ?
 
How come you didn't get the correct result in the second case...?You're adding negative #-s which are scalars.Are u sure you're not screwing up arithmetics...?

Daniel.
 
Ok I got it, thanks a lot. I was using the wrong distance for q1q4
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K