Electric Potential Difference in a Uniformly Charged Infinite Cylinder?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference in a uniformly charged infinite cylinder with radius R and volumetric charge density ρ. The user attempts to compute the potential difference between the cylinder's axis and its surface using the formula V(A) - V(B) = ∫ E * dr, correctly identifying that the electric field E is constant along the path. However, confusion arises regarding the work done in moving a charge q from the axis to the surface, with uncertainty about the appropriate formula to use. The inability to compute the electric potential at a point on the surface is attributed to the undefined nature of potential at infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of Gauss's Law for electric fields
  • Concept of work done by electric forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law to derive electric fields for different charge distributions
  • Learn about the concept of electric potential and how it relates to electric fields
  • Explore the relationship between work done and electric potential difference
  • Investigate the implications of potential at infinity in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields and potentials in charged systems.

ashe540
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We have a piece of a cylinder of infinite length and radius R, charged with a uniform and positive volumetric density of charge p.
Compute:

a) Difference of electric potential between the axis of the cylinder and its surface.

b) Work to carry a charge q from the axis to the surface of the cylinder. Is this work done by the forces of the electric field, or is it external to the field forces?

c) Compute the electric potential of a point on the surface of the cylinder (this potential could be computed as the difference of potential between such point and the infinite). But this potential can not be computed. Why is it not possible to compute the potential on a point, but it´s possible to compute differences of potential in this problem?a) What I did was using the difference of electric potential formula
*********A******
V(A)-V(B)= ∫ E*dr **
********* B *****

I set the A and B points as 0 (for the axis which I took as the origin) and R as the surface. Then I pulled E out of the integral because it´s constant and integrated dr. I´m not sure if this is the right way about doing it.

b) As for the work I wasn´t sure what to do here. I never have clear which formula to use for which cases. Whether W=qEd or W=q* [V(A)-V(B)]

c) I started thinking about it and I was thinking that maybe it had something to do with the fact that given the formula V=W/Q , that W is not given. Does this have anything to do with it?

Help please, I'm really lost
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


where did you get the idea that E was uniform at different radii?
E.A = E 2πrL = 4πk (rho)πr^2L , so the E increases with radius.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K