Electric potential due to line of charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential due to a line of charge with a non-uniform charge density. Participants are exploring the appropriate equations and methods to apply in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a formula for electric potential but finds it does not suit the non-uniform charge density of the problem. Some participants suggest integrating the charge density to find the potential, while others question the applicability of the initial formula used.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the need for a different approach due to the non-uniform charge distribution. Guidance has been offered regarding the integration of charge density, and there is an ongoing exploration of how to set up the integral correctly.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the distinction between uniform and non-uniform charge densities, which affects the choice of formulas and methods for calculating electric potential. Participants are also addressing the need for clarity on the charge distribution along the line of charge.

stickyrice581
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/9112/54077471xz4.jpg

Homework Equations



http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1450/clipboard01bt7.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The online chapter gave me the above equation for the potential due a continuous charge. I converted pico coulomb to coulomb and cm to m. I also did charge times length for lambda. I got .0644 Volts and the site says its wrong. So then I tried charge divided by length for lambda. I got 3.28 Volts and it's also wrong. Any ideas?

:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi stickyrice581,

stickyrice581 said:

Homework Statement





Homework Equations



http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1450/clipboard01bt7.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The online chapter gave me the above equation for the potential due a continuous charge. I converted pico coulomb to coulomb and cm to m. I also did charge times length for lambda. I got .0644 Volts and the site says its wrong. So then I tried charge divided by length for lambda. I got 3.28 Volts and it's also wrong. Any ideas?

:)

The formula that you have does not apply to this situation. That formula was calculated for a uniform charge density. However, in your problem the charge density is different at different parts of the rod.

So you'll need to calculate an analogous formula for your case. What do you get?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you have to integrate the charge density for Q. It actually greatly simplifies the integral.

V = k*int(dq/x) from .05m to .19m

Now the trick is rewriting the dq in terms of dx
 
Is there a formula I can use for my problem?
 
stickyrice581 said:
Is there a formula I can use for my problem?

king vitamin gave you the formula in his post:

[tex] V = k \int \frac{dq}{r}[/tex]
where the integral is taken over the charge distribution.

If you look in your book where you found the formula you have in your first post, you should see how they use this integral for the uniformly charged rod. Just follow the same type of procedure, using the fact that this rod is non-uniformly charged.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K