Electric potential due to line of charge

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 9K views
stickyrice581
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/9112/54077471xz4.jpg

Homework Equations



http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1450/clipboard01bt7.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The online chapter gave me the above equation for the potential due a continuous charge. I converted pico coulomb to coulomb and cm to m. I also did charge times length for lambda. I got .0644 Volts and the site says its wrong. So then I tried charge divided by length for lambda. I got 3.28 Volts and it's also wrong. Any ideas?

:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi stickyrice581,

stickyrice581 said:

Homework Statement





Homework Equations



http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1450/clipboard01bt7.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The online chapter gave me the above equation for the potential due a continuous charge. I converted pico coulomb to coulomb and cm to m. I also did charge times length for lambda. I got .0644 Volts and the site says its wrong. So then I tried charge divided by length for lambda. I got 3.28 Volts and it's also wrong. Any ideas?

:)

The formula that you have does not apply to this situation. That formula was calculated for a uniform charge density. However, in your problem the charge density is different at different parts of the rod.

So you'll need to calculate an analogous formula for your case. What do you get?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you have to integrate the charge density for Q. It actually greatly simplifies the integral.

V = k*int(dq/x) from .05m to .19m

Now the trick is rewriting the dq in terms of dx
 
stickyrice581 said:
Is there a formula I can use for my problem?

king vitamin gave you the formula in his post:

[tex] V = k \int \frac{dq}{r}[/tex]
where the integral is taken over the charge distribution.

If you look in your book where you found the formula you have in your first post, you should see how they use this integral for the uniformly charged rod. Just follow the same type of procedure, using the fact that this rod is non-uniformly charged.