Electric Potential Earth and Sun?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric potential of the Earth and the Sun, exploring theoretical implications and the nature of electric charge in celestial bodies. Participants examine concepts related to plasma physics, charge neutrality, and the implications of electric forces compared to gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate on the Sun's electric charge, suggesting it could be strongly positive due to the presence of plasma and the ejection of electrons.
  • Others argue that both the Sun and Earth are electrically neutral to a high degree, positing that any imbalance in charge would lead to significant electric forces that would dominate over gravitational forces.
  • There is a discussion about the dynamics of electron and proton ejection from the Sun, with some suggesting that a balance is reached that maintains overall neutrality.
  • One participant mentions the density of the Sun's core and the time it takes for photons to travel from the core to the surface, raising questions about potential differences within the Sun itself.
  • Another participant challenges the accuracy of the time it takes for photons to travel from the core to the surface, indicating a discrepancy in understanding but noting it may not significantly impact the discussion.
  • The implications of the gravitational constant and Coulomb's constant are discussed, with a participant highlighting the vast forces that would arise from even a small amount of free charge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the electric potential of the Sun and Earth, with some supporting the idea of significant charge while others maintain that both bodies are effectively neutral. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding, including assumptions about charge distribution and the complexities of plasma behavior in celestial bodies. There are references to Velikovsky's theories, which are generally dismissed as non-scientific.

NJV
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Reading about Velikovsky's pseudoscience, I wondered what the values of the Earth and sun's electric potential really are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never really thought about it before, but the Sun should be very strongly charged. It is mostly plasma, meaning protons without electrons orbiting them. I don't know how many of those electrons are ejected into space as radiation, but I know that some are. This should leave the Sun with a very strong positive charge (relatve to Earth).

Now, I'm going to do a search on Velikovsky, to find out what you're talking about.
 
Velikovsky believes that Venus was ejected from Jupiter and similar peculiarities, based on ancient mythologies. It's kind of interesting, but not scientific.
 
The sun and the earth, I would imagine, are both electrically neutral to an enormous degree of precision. If even a fraction of a percent of the sun's mass was not neutral the electric attraction it would exert (even on neutral objects) would far outweigh its graviational attraction. The sun may be mostly plasma but that just means that the electrons aren't attached to a particular proton it by no means suggests that there are more electrons then protons present.
 
LURCH said:
I don't know how many of those electrons are ejected into space as radiation, but I know that some are.

Yes, and so are protons. This makes the sun electrically neutral to a very good approximation.

Think about it. Once an electron is ejected, the sun becomes positively charged, and it becomes that much harder to eject the next electron, and that much easier to eject the next proton. Furthermore, it will be that much more likely to capture a passing electron and that much less likely to capture a passing proton. The system will very quickly reach an equilibrium.
 
Yes, I thought that too when I read that. Although then again, protons have far greater mass and therefore require more energy to be expelled. Furthermore, despite its heat the sun isn't all fluid, with the core having a density 150 times that of water. I've read photons take about a million years to travel from the core to the surface. With such separation between core and surface, there might very well be a difference between the outer and inner layers. Of course there are relative potential differences in almost any spherical body, but I want to know what its potential relative to other spherical bodies would be.

(Of course Velikovsky was wrong and electromagnetism obviously plays no observable role in the movement of the planets.)
 
NJV said:
I've read photons take about a million years to travel from the core to the surface.
Actually about 100,000 years, if I remember correctly... not that it matters much.

Anyway, unless you're doing very high-precision measurements I would think you could assume the Sun's potential to be zero. :-/
 
Hm. Has that in any way been verified? It would certainly debunk Velikovsky's myths. A friend of mine is fascinated by them.
 
because the universal gravitation constant G is over the order 10^-11 and the coulomb constant k is of the order 10^9. That means if there was even a single coulomb of free charge it would generate as much force as 10^20 kilograms! and the sun only weighs 10^30
 
  • #10
I suppose that decisively settles it. Thanks for your reply, starstrider!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K