Electric potential of a charged shell- Self potential?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the potential difference between two non-conducting concentric spherical shells with radii R1 and R2. The participants clarify that the shells are uniformly charged and address the inclusion of an extra term in the potential equations, specifically KQ/R, which represents the self potential of each shell. The potential difference is derived using the equation ΔV = -∫E.dr, emphasizing the importance of defining a common reference point, typically at infinity, for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the concept of concentric spherical shells
  • Knowledge of the integral calculus involved in potential calculations
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including charge distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for uniformly charged spherical shells
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field and potential energy in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of self potential and its implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the use of reference points in electric potential calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric potential and field interactions in charged systems.

Adithyan
Messages
113
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



I recently encountered a problem wherein I was asked to calculate the potential difference between two non conducting concentric spherical shells of radii R1 and R2.

Homework Equations



ΔV=-∫E.dr

The Attempt at a Solution



While I was able to calculate the potentials of individual spheres due to the other's electric field, I could not understand why, in the solution, an extra term in each sphere's potential was mentioned. The extra term was KQ/R (Where Q=charge of the sphere in consideration and R=its Radius). I later understood that the term can be indirectly called Self Potential (like we have self energy). But How can we calculate the self potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Adithyan,

Somewhat incomplete, your problem statement: I suppose the shells were uniformly charged ?
Never mind. Extra term had a sign, too ? What were the exact expressions for these potentials ?

A potential is determined to an arbitrary constant, that generally is chosen in such a way that the potential is zero at infinite distance. There is only one constant, so with two shells there must be a common reference (again, generally V at infinity = 0). I suspect that's where these terms come from.
 
Sorry I didn't mention it earlier- the shells were uniformly charged. The extra term had a sign equal to the sign of the shell's charge. The exact expression was: V1 (Potential of the smaller sphere) = KQ2/ R2 (Potential due to the bigger sphere) + KQ1/R1 (The 'extra' term I was talking about.) And yes, infinity was the reference point for this question.

The extra term could be the potential of the sphere due to its charge. I tried deriving it this way:
Let us consider a spherical shell of uniformly distributed charge Q and radius R. For a small element charge dq, potential due to the remaining charge (Q-dq) can be written as:
dV =\frac{ K(q-dq)}{R} (We can think of the distribution to be situated at the centre at a distance of R from dq)
But, integrating this term does not give the desired answer.
 
Last edited:
You seem to mix potential function with the potential energy of a system.

There is an electric field around and in between the concentric charged spheres, which depends on the distance from the centre. That field has potential, U(r) and the negative gradient of the potential is equal to the electric field: E=-∇U.
If you put a test charge q into the field it feels force equal to qE. When the test charge moves from r1 to r2 the field does q(U(r1)-U(r2)) work on it.

The charged spheres have some potential energy. It is equal to the work done when bringing the charge onto the spheres.

You can talk about the potential energy of a charged sphere, or the potential at a certain point in the field of that charged sphere. If that point is on the surface of a conducting sphere, one can speak of the "potential of the sphere", but then you need to specify the reference point.

ehild
 
ehild said:
You seem to mix potential function with the potential energy of a system.

There is an electric field around and in between the concentric charged spheres, which depends on the distance from the centre. That field has potential, U(r) and the negative gradient of the potential is equal to the electric field: E=-∇U.
If you put a test charge q into the field it feels force equal to qE. When the test charge moves from r1 to r2 the field does q(U(r1)-U(r2)) work on it.

The charged spheres have some potential energy. It is equal to the work done when bringing the charge onto the spheres.

You can talk about the potential energy of a charged sphere, or the potential at a certain point in the field of that charged sphere. If that point is on the surface of a conducting sphere, one can speak of the "potential of the sphere", but then you need to specify the reference point.

ehild
I agree with your statements but I am afraid that does not answer my queries. The question clearly asks for potential difference between the spheres with infinity as the reference point. And I believe I have not mixed potential and potential energy in any of my steps/ statements.

Forget my attempt at the solution and queries; can you derive and state here the potential difference between the spheres?
Thanks in advance.
 
What was the problem exactly? You wrote in the OP
I was asked to calculate the potential difference between two non conducting concentric spherical shells of radii R1 and R2

Was it a non-conducting shell with inner radius R1 and outer radius R2? And what about the charge distribution?

ehild
 
ehild said:
What was the problem exactly? You wrote in the OP

Was it a non-conducting shell with inner radius R1 and outer radius R2? And what about the charge distribution?

ehild

Yes, the inner and outer radii are R1 and R2 respectively. And they are uniformly charged.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
499
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
890
Replies
2
Views
680
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K