Electric potential of a conductor.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the electric potential of charged conductors and the effects of bringing an earthed object close to them. It is established that a conductor is an equipotential, meaning all points within it are at the same potential. When an earthed conductor approaches a negatively charged conductor, free electrons in the earthed conductor are repelled, leading to a loss of negative charge and an increase in the potential of the negatively charged conductor. Additionally, the charge distribution on a spherical metallic shell is uniform only if the charge inside is centered; otherwise, the distribution varies based on the position of the internal charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and work done on charges
  • Knowledge of conductors as equipotential surfaces
  • Familiarity with electrostatics and charge distribution
  • Basic concepts of induced charge and grounding
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electrostatics in detail
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields in conductors
  • Explore the concept of induced charge and its effects on nearby conductors
  • Investigate charge distribution in spherical conductors with varying internal charge positions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the behavior of electric potential in conductors.

Terocamo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know the definition of electric potential is the work done to bring a test charge from infinity to a particular point.
But I read about some question asking the electric potential of a charged conductor,
I wonder what that means, whether it is the potential of the surface of the conductor or otherwise.

Also, I don't understand the concept of bringing a earthed object close to a charged conductor will
decrease the magnitude of potential of that charged object.
eg. my notes mention the induced charge inside the eathed object contrubutes a positive potential
to make the potential of the negative charged conductor LESS negative. Itsn't an earthed object
have zero potential? So how can it contrubute any potential.

Thz :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terocamo said:

Homework Statement


I know the definition of electric potential is the work done to bring a test charge from infinity to a particular point.
But I read about some question asking the electric potential of a charged conductor,
I wonder what that means, whether it is the potential of the surface of the conductor or otherwise.
What do you mean by "otherwise"? A conductor is an equipotential which means that all points that make up this conductor whether on the surface or underneath the surface are at the same potential.

Also, I don't understand the concept of bringing a earthed object close to a charged conductor will
decrease the magnitude of potential of that charged object.
eg. my notes mention the induced charge inside the eathed object contrubutes a positive potential
to make the potential of the negative charged conductor LESS negative. Itsn't an earthed object
have zero potential? So how can it contrubute any potential.

Thz :blushing:
The earthed conductor is always at zero potential. If you bring it close to a negatively charged conductor, free electrons inside the earthed conductor will be pushed into the Earth as they are repelled by the negative charges on the other conductor. The loss of negative charges in the earthed conductor raises the potential of the negatively charged conductor because it is essentially a gain of positive charge in that region of space.
 
kuruman said:
The loss of negative charges in the earthed conductor raises the potential of the negatively charged conductor because it is essentially a gain of positive charge in that region of space.

Thz first, you clear some of my wrong concepts, but i am still puzzled by how the potential is raised.
I now understand the earthed object gains positive charge and produce a field to compensate
the potential due to the negative charge conductor in order to maintain zero potential. (I hope
thats a right concept :bugeye:)
Is it that potential due to the earthed object raised the potential of the charged object? :confused:
 
Ive got another question about electric field.

There is a spherical metallic shell of uniform thickness which is neutral. A positive charge is put inside it
but not anywhere close to the centre of the spherical shell. Why is it the charge deposit on the outer and inner surface of the
shell distrubute unitformly?
Itsnt the electrostatic force stronger if closer? I thought the negative charge will gathered
at a pt close the the positive charge and it will disturb the distrubution of charge.
 
Terocamo said:
Is it that potential due to the earthed object raised the potential of the charged object? :confused:
Yes. The potential of the earthed object is always zero.
 
Terocamo said:
Ive got another question about electric field.

There is a spherical metallic shell of uniform thickness which is neutral. A positive charge is put inside it
but not anywhere close to the centre of the spherical shell. Why is it the charge deposit on the outer and inner surface of the
shell distrubute unitformly?
The charge on the outer surface only is distributed uniformly if the charge inside the cavity is off center. To get uniform distribution on the inner surface, you need to have the charge in the center. You can change the charge distribution on the inner surface by moving the charge in the cavity around, but that does not affect the charge distribution on the outer surface because the electric field inside the conductor is always zero so the inside distribution cannot communicate to the outside distribution what is happening to it.
 
Thz again, it is very helpful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K