Electrical Engineering vs Physics vs Computer Science

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for a high school senior choosing between Electrical Engineering (EE), Physics, and Computer Science (CS) as potential college majors. Participants explore the implications of each field in terms of career prospects, personal interests, and academic requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about choosing between EE, CS, and Physics, highlighting interests in both electronics and programming.
  • Another participant notes that EE is a broad field that allows for taking CS courses and may incorporate physics knowledge, suggesting EE as a starting point.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that a physics degree may be less useful in the job market compared to EE or CS, but acknowledges that pursuing physics is valid if there is a strong interest.
  • One participant, identifying as a physicist, agrees that EE is broad and may satisfy interests in physics, while also mentioning that the financial prospects for physicists are improving.
  • Another contributor advocates for starting with EE, stating that it allows for future specialization in CS or Physics, citing examples of successful transitions from EE to advanced studies in Physics.
  • A participant shares personal experience, indicating a preference for EE/EET due to hands-on learning and existing experience, while noting potential income differences between EE and CS graduates.
  • One suggestion includes exploring dual degree options in EE and CS, which could provide a broader educational foundation.
  • A participant raises concerns about the detailed nature of tasks in CS and EE, questioning whether modern physics majors can avoid extensive programming or similar detailed tasks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the merits of each major, with no clear consensus on which path is definitively better. Some advocate for EE based on its breadth and job prospects, while others highlight the value of pursuing Physics if there is a strong interest. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about job markets, personal interests, and the nature of coursework in each field, but these assumptions are not universally agreed upon. The discussion reflects individual perspectives and experiences without resolving the complexities involved in choosing a major.

sheldonrocks97
Gold Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
I'm a high school senior and I'm going to tech school in the Fall. I applied and was admitted as an EE major, but I am also interested in possibly getting a degree in computer science or Physics instead. I always thought that EE was cool, but I also would be interested in being a computer scientist or physicist as well.

I've always been interested in computers and started using them since I was 3 and I know a bit of programming and think some of it is interesting. Then again, I am also interested in electronics as well and think they are interesting, too.

I'm not sure what degree to get and I'm transferring a lot of community college classes to a university so I'll have less time to make my decision.

Also, I have heard that computer science and EE majors make a ton of money after graduation, but physicist don't make as much.

I'm not sure what major to pick and I'm going to college in the Fall and I have to make a class schedule accordingly. What do you guys recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EE is a very broad field.

As an EE typically you can take some CS courses.
As an EE you also may end up taking classes that require electromagnetic knowledge that you would learn in physics.

I would recommend thinking about what you want to do when you are older. If you had to make a decision now, I would recommend going EE to start. Worst case senerio you lose a semester and double back to CS or physics.

Note I'm biased I am an EE
 
You have lots to time to decide what you want to do, but keep in mind of the three things you mentioned a physics degree will likely be least useful when you’re looking for a job after school (assuming the job market doesn’t do something very unexpected). IMO for what it’s worth, if you feel really strongly about majoring in physics I’d say go ahead and do physics, but if it’s a competition between physics and something else do the something else.
 
I am a physicist but I agree with Donpacino. EE is a very broad field and you may find your yearning for physics is entirely satisfied within the EE discipline. Most EE's do a great deal of computing as well. I think the monetary situation for physicists is improving (I graduated 35 years ago) but I think EE continues to have the edge.
 
Go EE. You definitely won't have a problem going to Grad School for CS. Depending on what you specialize in you can go to grad school for Physics. One of my colleagues is a leading researcher in String Theory and he did his undergrad in EE.
 
It's whatever you prefer, honestly. CS and EE are both solid degrees that lead down very different pathways, generally speaking.

I did a year in CS and a year in EET, I prefer EE/EET. I chose EET because it is more hands on than EE and I am a hands on kinda guy, and I already have electrical and electronics experience that will apply towards nearly any job I will get with an EET degree. When I say EET, I mean the 4 year degree from an ABET accredited university, not just the 2 year CC degree.

EE does seem to make more starting out than a CS degree, but with both the sky is the limit when it comes to income.

Also, do you know any programming languages? You will have to learn some in a CS degree, so if you do not like to program you may not like getting your CS degree.
 
Last edited:
At my university you can get a dual degree in EE and CS with only one extra year of study. Might be worth looking into.
 
shedonrocks97,

What is your tolerance for detailed nit-picky tasks?

I have the impression that CS people cannot avoid courses that involve many clerical aspects. (Perhaps its unfair to characterize the art of programming as having clerical aspects, but I will.) Glance at a text on compiler design and you'll see what I mean.

I think EE's get in the same extremes of detail in courses involving programming digital devices. I don't know whether a modern EE major can side step those. Perhaps he can if he specializes in power systems.

It would be interesting to hear comments on whether the modern physics majors can avoid doing a lot of computer programming or similar tasks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K