Electrodynamics Method of imaging

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the method of image charges, particularly the challenge of understanding the sphere example compared to the simpler case of a point charge above an infinite conducting plate. The derivation of the mirror charge value for the sphere is highlighted, with emphasis on how the position and value of the mirror charge are chosen to cancel the electric field from the original charge. A specific calculation is provided, showing that the mirror charge can be expressed as Q = -qR/p, where R is the distance and p is a parameter related to the sphere's geometry. The importance of satisfying Laplace's equation and the resulting boundary conditions is also noted, confirming the validity of the solution. Understanding this method allows for simplification of complex electrostatic problems into manageable forms.
sleventh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have recently been taught the method of imagging with opposite point charges. The stereotypical example of a point charge above an infinit conducting plate comes fine but i can't grasp the sphere example. It is shown http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_image_charges" , I can't see how they derive the value of the mirror charge, thank you very much any help is appreciated.

sleventh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Who knows? At least we know that the solution to Laplace's equation will be unique. How they came up with the image charge is probably a long and boring process. It could have just been that someone solved the problem by directly finding a solution to the associated Laplace equation and then noticed that you could decompose it into the summation of the charge and an image charge. Lots of times it seems that complicated relationships that can be distilled into more simplified physical situations are usually found after the fact by playing around with the results and trying to decompose them into more meaningful forms.

But apart from however they came up with the relationship, as long as we can prove that it satisifies Laplace's equation and the resulting boundary equations then we know it is the solution to the potential. This part is easier to show as they have done in the Wikipedia article.
 
sleventh said:
Hello all,

I have recently been taught the method of imagging with opposite point charges. The stereotypical example of a point charge above an infinit conducting plate comes fine but i can't grasp the sphere example. It is shown http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_image_charges" , I can't see how they derive the value of the mirror charge, thank you very much any help is appreciated.

sleventh

It is chosen so as to cancel exactly the field from q at the position R between the two charges.I.e. the position and value of the mirror charge is chosen to accomplish this. You can either have a large mirror charge far away, or a smaller charge closer by. So there is a free parameter that is chosen so that the system describes a sphere. If I assume that the mirror charge is located at R^2/p on the x-axis, I get for the mirror charge Q:

Cancellation of the potential at x=R:
q/(R-p) + Q/(R^2/p - R) = 0

Gives:
Q = -qR/p

In this I already assumed that the mirror charge would be located at R^2/p. If you want to derive this, you need to leave that as a free parameter, write down the total potential as they do, and then determine for which mirror charge position the V=0 equipotential surface is a sphere of the correct radius.

Torquil
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
500
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K