Electromagnetic induction emf question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on electromagnetic induction and the effects of changing resistance in a circuit on current and brightness of light bulbs. The correct answer to the posed problem is identified as D, which indicates that when the resistance is halved, the brightness of the first light bulb (L1) decreases despite the expectation that it should increase. This is explained through the relationship between magnetic flux, induced emf, and circuit impedance, particularly when inductive reactance (X) is greater than the resistance (R) of the bulbs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of inductive reactance and impedance in AC circuits
  • Ability to apply the right-hand rule for current direction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between magnetic flux and induced emf in circuits
  • Learn about inductive reactance and its impact on circuit behavior
  • Explore the effects of resistance changes on current flow in series and parallel circuits
  • Investigate the implications of circuit impedance on brightness in light bulbs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and educators teaching circuit theory and electromagnetic induction concepts.

EF17xx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to show their work on the problem in order to get our tutorial help

Homework Statement


4650B981-CBD2-433F-8174-D0FA858C0106.jpeg


The correct answer is D

Homework Equations


4C95298F-5549-47C9-AE58-88F4E22ECB4C.jpeg


The Attempt at a Solution



The current is clockwise( in the first picture at least) due to right hand rule.

The magnetic flux is changing, the direction of the induced emf depends on the direction of change (increase or decrease)

Please help me solve this problem.
 

Attachments

  • 4650B981-CBD2-433F-8174-D0FA858C0106.jpeg
    4650B981-CBD2-433F-8174-D0FA858C0106.jpeg
    40.3 KB · Views: 1,330
  • 4C95298F-5549-47C9-AE58-88F4E22ECB4C.jpeg
    4C95298F-5549-47C9-AE58-88F4E22ECB4C.jpeg
    16 KB · Views: 1,948
Physics news on Phys.org
How does decreasing the resistance in the circuit above decrease the current?
 
Dr Dr news said:
How does decreasing the resistance in the circuit above decrease the current?

Decreasing the resistance means current can flow more easily, therefore ALL current chooses path of least resistance (through the copper wire) and so none goes through light bulb 2 ?
 
I agree that no current goes through L2. The question is why does L1 get dimmer?
 
Dr Dr news said:
I agree that no current goes through L2. The question is why does L1 get dimmer?

The area got smaller (this means that flux got smaller) from the equation flux = BAcos(theta)
When magnetic flux changes there is an emf induced, with a current that will oppose the change. Since flux got smaller we want it to increase right?
To increase it the direction of the induced current must be so that its magnetic field is in the same direction as the existing magnetic field to get more of it and increase the flux. When it its in the same direction the current is clockwise? as it is initially This would increase the current, and therefore actually make the lightbulb brighter.
Therefore I'm obviously wrong, what part of my thinking is wrong?
 
When I look at your diagram and read the problem, there is no reason to believe that dφ/dt is different after shorting out L2. It appears the the emf generated in the circuit is the same. The only difference is that the resistance has been halved. Where did answer D come from?
 
Dr Dr news said:
When I look at your diagram and read the problem, there is no reason to believe that dφ/dt is different after shorting out L2. It appears the the emf generated in the circuit is the same. The only difference is that the resistance has been halved. Where did answer D come from?

Yes ok I agree, but if the resistance is halved shouldn't the brightness increase? The answer came from the back of the book.

The problem states that the magnetic field is changing however wouldn't that mean that the current keeps changing direction also. Even though that still doesn't seem helpful to me because we don't know what the change is therefore don't know the current direction.
 
I'm afraid that finding a wrong answer to an end-of-chapter problem is not that rare. Although it hurts me to admit this, I too have made several mistakes this year so far and it's early.
 
Dr Dr news said:
I'm afraid that finding a wrong answer to an end-of-chapter problem is not that rare. Although it hurts me to admit this, I too have made several mistakes this year so far and it's early.

Thanks for your help and honesty nonetheless.
 
  • #10
Answer D could be right. We don't know the frequency of the mag field B. The loop has inductive reactance X & the resistance of the bulbs R+R. If X > 2R, then shorti g out o e lamp results in nearly the same current. The impedance of the loop goes from 2R + jX, then to R + jX. Since jX dominates, current hardly changes, increasing slightly.
But the look are decreases, which decreases enclosed flux. So the open circuit voltage & loop current decrease as well.
D is correct here.
But if X < R, then current may not decrease when lamp gets shorted. When X is small the loop impedance is dominated by 2R. Loop current is open circuit voltage divided by 2R. If lamp 2 gets shorted, then loop impedance is one times R plus jX. Since R > X, R dominates. Open circuit voltage drops due to decreased area, but impedance drops from 2R to R, neglecting jX as it is small. Smaller voltage with smaller impedance could result in current increasing, decreasing, or near the same.
Ok?

Claude
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
960
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
984
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K