Electromagnetic potential well, impossible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electromagnetic potential wells, particularly in the context of Paul traps and linear ion traps. Participants explore the feasibility of creating a constant electromagnetic potential well and the complexities involved in such systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the Paul trap as having a saddle point potential, where oscillating poles create a dynamic trapping environment, questioning the necessity of a saddle point over a constant minimum.
  • Another participant references an article suggesting the possibility of creating an electrostatic potential well, implying that it contradicts the initial claim about the impossibility of constant electromagnetic potential wells.
  • Some participants express confusion about the complexity of Paul traps compared to linear ion traps, which seem to create potential wells for ions along the axis of electrodes.
  • A later reply acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding linear traps, emphasizing that they still require an RF field for operation and suggesting that the Swiss team's findings may depend on non-linear dielectric effects in fluids.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of creating a constant electromagnetic potential well. There are competing views regarding the nature of potential wells in different trapping systems, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of different trapping mechanisms and the potential dependence on specific conditions, such as the presence of RF fields or non-linear effects, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

Waxbear
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I was having a discussion with my friend the other day. He had just attended a lecture about Paul traps. He told me that the Paul trap potential has a stationary point in the middle, which is a saddle point, and that the 2 pairs of opposite poles are oscillating between being positive and negative, such that the 'hills' and 'valleys' of the potential are constantly switching place. Then anything placed near the saddle point will find itself on a slope most of the time and thus be relatively trapped. When i asked why it had to be a saddle point and not just a constant minimum, he said that it was because it is impossible to create a consant electromagnetic potential well.

I remember hearing a bit about this during my introductory electromagnetism course. But that was well over a year ago and i can't remember the argument for this. A google search didn't give me anything either. So is there a law or an equation you can point me to, which will make this obvious to me? Maybe it comes out easily from one of Maxwell's equations. I took EM1 and EM2 (which makes it slightly embarassing that i don't know this) so you know my prerequisites for understanding your explanations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This one may only apply to fluids, but have a look: www.nano-optics.ethz.ch/publications/krishnan.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well yes, in that article it certainly seems like they are able to make an electrostatic potential well. So it seems to be possible. I wonder why Paul traps are so complicated then.
 
Waxbear said:
Well yes, in that article it certainly seems like they are able to make an electrostatic potential well. So it seems to be possible. I wonder why Paul traps are so complicated then.
Yeah, just looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_ion_trap, complication is the word. At the bottom, you might like to Google-chase on the Linear and Cylindrical traps mentioned there - they seem to be purely electrostatic going by brief descriptions offered.
 
Looking at Linear Ion Trap: "or as an actual trap by creating a potential well for the ions along the axis of the electrodes." So it seems that it is possible to create an electromagnetic potential well after all.
 
Waxbear said:
Looking at Linear Ion Trap: "or as an actual trap by creating a potential well for the ions along the axis of the electrodes." So it seems that it is possible to create an electromagnetic potential well after all.
Sorry to say I gave you a wrong steer on the linear trap thing. Take a look here:
First part of intro reads:
Linear ion traps are finding new applications in many areas of mass spectrometry. In a linear ion trap, ions are confined radially by a two-dimensional (2D) radio frequency (RF) field, and axially by stopping potentials applied to end electrodes.
So still needs an rf field. I really haven't checked through the Swiss team's arrangement, but it may critically depend on non-linear dielectric effects in fluids - not sure and not willing to dig deep there. Good hunting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K