Electromagnetic potential well, impossible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating an electromagnetic potential well, particularly in the context of Paul traps. It is noted that Paul traps utilize oscillating electric fields to create a saddle point potential, which allows particles to be trapped. The conversation reveals confusion about the existence of constant electromagnetic potential wells, with references to literature suggesting that electrostatic potential wells can be created. However, it is clarified that linear ion traps still require radio frequency fields for effective operation. Overall, the complexity of Paul traps and the conditions necessary for potential wells in electromagnetic systems are highlighted.
Waxbear
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I was having a discussion with my friend the other day. He had just attended a lecture about Paul traps. He told me that the Paul trap potential has a stationary point in the middle, which is a saddle point, and that the 2 pairs of opposite poles are oscillating between being positive and negative, such that the 'hills' and 'valleys' of the potential are constantly switching place. Then anything placed near the saddle point will find itself on a slope most of the time and thus be relatively trapped. When i asked why it had to be a saddle point and not just a constant minimum, he said that it was because it is impossible to create a consant electromagnetic potential well.

I remember hearing a bit about this during my introductory electromagnetism course. But that was well over a year ago and i can't remember the argument for this. A google search didn't give me anything either. So is there a law or an equation you can point me to, which will make this obvious to me? Maybe it comes out easily from one of Maxwell's equations. I took EM1 and EM2 (which makes it slightly embarassing that i don't know this) so you know my prerequisites for understanding your explanations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This one may only apply to fluids, but have a look: www.nano-optics.ethz.ch/publications/krishnan.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well yes, in that article it certainly seems like they are able to make an electrostatic potential well. So it seems to be possible. I wonder why Paul traps are so complicated then.
 
Waxbear said:
Well yes, in that article it certainly seems like they are able to make an electrostatic potential well. So it seems to be possible. I wonder why Paul traps are so complicated then.
Yeah, just looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_ion_trap, complication is the word. At the bottom, you might like to Google-chase on the Linear and Cylindrical traps mentioned there - they seem to be purely electrostatic going by brief descriptions offered.
 
Looking at Linear Ion Trap: "or as an actual trap by creating a potential well for the ions along the axis of the electrodes." So it seems that it is possible to create an electromagnetic potential well after all.
 
Waxbear said:
Looking at Linear Ion Trap: "or as an actual trap by creating a potential well for the ions along the axis of the electrodes." So it seems that it is possible to create an electromagnetic potential well after all.
Sorry to say I gave you a wrong steer on the linear trap thing. Take a look here:
First part of intro reads:
Linear ion traps are finding new applications in many areas of mass spectrometry. In a linear ion trap, ions are confined radially by a two-dimensional (2D) radio frequency (RF) field, and axially by stopping potentials applied to end electrodes.
So still needs an rf field. I really haven't checked through the Swiss team's arrangement, but it may critically depend on non-linear dielectric effects in fluids - not sure and not willing to dig deep there. Good hunting.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top