Electromagnetic Radiation in Space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of electromagnetic waves as they pass through a point in space, exploring whether there are any lingering effects or "wakes" left behind after the wave has passed. Participants examine this concept from various angles, including theoretical implications, interactions with different media, and the nature of memory in materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that electromagnetic waves can either be continuous or pulsed, with effects lasting as long as the wave itself in free space.
  • Others argue that if the space contains a medium, the electromagnetic wave may interact with it, leading to energy absorption and potential re-release in different forms, such as kinetic energy or radiation.
  • A participant introduces the concept of constitutive relations, noting that most do not exhibit memory, but some can be formulated to include fading memory effects.
  • There is a discussion on the frequency dependence of the dielectric function in materials and its relation to causality and memory effects.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the "fading memory" concept, suggesting that without resonance in the medium, any after effects would merely be dispersion rather than oscillatory behavior.
  • Nonlinear effects, such as optical damage or bleaching, are mentioned as phenomena that could relate to the current optical response of materials based on their past history.
  • There is a contention regarding whether any vibrational energy remains after the wave passes, with some participants asserting that there are very few instances where this occurs.
  • Examples of temporary effects, like photochromic sunglasses, are brought up to illustrate potential lingering effects, though the consensus on the existence of significant aftereffects remains unclear.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether electromagnetic waves leave behind any significant effects after passing through a point in space. Multiple competing views exist regarding the nature of interactions with media and the implications of memory in materials.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the type of medium and the specific conditions under which the electromagnetic wave interacts with it. The discussion also touches on complex concepts such as nonlinear effects and constitutive relations, which may not be universally applicable.

Sturk200
Messages
168
Reaction score
17
I'm not sure where to ask this question or if it even makes sense...

Say an electromagnetic wave passes through a point in space. The point experiences some fluctuation of electric and magnetic fields. But what happens after the wave has passed? Are there any lingering effects, like a "wake" of some kind, or does the wave leave absolutely no evidence of its having been there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave you are referring to can either be a 'continuous wave', which will be going on for ever or it will be a burst or single pulse, lasting for a finite time. The effect on the space it passes through will take the same time interval as the burst / pulse itself. (If you are talking of free, empty space) If your 'space' has anything in it ( even a very rarified gas or plasma) the EM will interact with the medium and some of the energy will be absorbed by the medium and released after a delay. (Probably very short) the original waveform will become dispersed (which is what you refer to, I think)
You could insert some fancy resonators into your space that would spread the wave out and delay it by a significant amount of time.
 
sophiecentaur said:
The wave you are referring to can either be a 'continuous wave', which will be going on for ever or it will be a burst or single pulse, lasting for a finite time. The effect on the space it passes through will take the same time interval as the burst / pulse itself. (If you are talking of free, empty space) If your 'space' has anything in it ( even a very rarified gas or plasma) the EM will interact with the medium and some of the energy will be absorbed by the medium and released after a delay. (Probably very short) the original waveform will become dispersed (which is what you refer to, I think)
You could insert some fancy resonators into your space that would spread the wave out and delay it by a significant amount of time.

Thanks for your answer. When you say it will be absorbed and then re-released by the medium, in what form would it be re-released? As kinetic energy in the medium, or do you mean that it would be re-released as radiation?
 
Sturk200 said:
Thanks for your answer. When you say it will be absorbed and then re-released by the medium, in what form would it be re-released? As kinetic energy in the medium, or do you mean that it would be re-released as radiation?

It depends upon the type of medium and the frequency and intensity of the EM wave. If the medium is my cell phone antenna, then the energy is transformed into the motion of the charges and the electric and magnetic effects from that motion.
 
At least in vacuum, the wave is nothing but electric and magnetic fields. So you can't say there remains anything once a wave has passed.
 
Sturk200 said:
I'm not sure where to ask this question or if it even makes sense...

Say an electromagnetic wave passes through a point in space. The point experiences some fluctuation of electric and magnetic fields. But what happens after the wave has passed? Are there any lingering effects, like a "wake" of some kind, or does the wave leave absolutely no evidence of its having been there?

This question can be phrased in terms of a constitutive relation- the response of a material (including 'vacuum') to an applied field. Most commonly-used constitutive relations do not have 'memory' (stochastic processes like this are called 'Markovian'), but it is possible to write down a constitutive equation that has 'fading memory'- stress relaxation and hypoelastic materials are mechanical analogs of this. The constitutive equations are typically of the 'Volterra type', see for example, http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=math
 
Andy Resnick said:
This question can be phrased in terms of a constitutive relation- the response of a material (including 'vacuum') to an applied field. Most commonly-used constitutive relations do not have 'memory' (stochastic processes like this are called 'Markovian'), but it is possible to write down a constitutive equation that has 'fading memory'- stress relaxation and hypoelastic materials are mechanical analogs of this. The constitutive equations are typically of the 'Volterra type', see for example, http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=math
In most materials (ecluding vacuum) the dielectric function depends on frequency. It can be shown that this corresponds to a fading memory.
 
DrDu said:
In most materials (ecluding vacuum) the dielectric function depends on frequency. It can be shown that this corresponds to a fading memory.

I'm not sure that's right- my understanding is that the frequency dependence is due to causality- the material cannot respond before the field arrives; alternatively, the Hilbert transform of the Heaviside step function.
 
The "fading memory" idea needs to be considered carefully. If there is no actual resonance in the medium, any after effects will only be a 'smearing' of the waveform (dispersion) and not 'ringing' due to the medium.
 
  • #10
sophiecentaur said:
The "fading memory" idea needs to be considered carefully. If there is no actual resonance in the medium, any after effects will only be a 'smearing' of the waveform (dispersion) and not 'ringing' due to the medium.

Yes and no- for example, optical damage/darkening of a material can be modeled this way (maybe that's a trivial example). Optical bleaching of a fluorophore could be another (silly) example. My point is simply that the current optical response of a material could depend on the past history.
 
  • #11
Yes. That's all non linear effects though ( as in photography) and there is no equivalent to a wave being left behind. No remaining 'oscillations' (?).
I guess that applies to mechanical waves too, when there are no resonances in the structure of the medium.
 
  • #12
sophiecentaur said:
Yes. That's all non linear effects though ( as in photography) and there is no equivalent to a wave being left behind. No remaining 'oscillations' (?).
I guess that applies to mechanical waves too, when there are no resonances in the structure of the medium.

No, that's not what I mean- it's certainly true that it's a nonlinear effect, but the nonlinear susceptibility is usually written as a time-independent thing: harmonic generation 4-wave mixing, stark effect, etc...

Boyd has a brief blurb about photodamage that's fairly qualitative, Gamaly's book

https://www.amazon.com/dp/9814241814/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Has more information, but modeling the process is still largely phenomenological.
 
  • #13
How about photochromic sunglasses? That's a temporary effect.
But all I am suggesting is that there are no (/very few) occasions when the wave leaves behind it some vibrational energy. An example would be interesting. Perhaps a decaying vibration would be enough, as long as it's not just a simple exponential (CR style) decay.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K