Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electromagnetic Radiation in Space

  1. Sep 15, 2015 #1
    I'm not sure where to ask this question or if it even makes sense...

    Say an electromagnetic wave passes through a point in space. The point experiences some fluctuation of electric and magnetic fields. But what happens after the wave has passed? Are there any lingering effects, like a "wake" of some kind, or does the wave leave absolutely no evidence of its having been there?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 15, 2015 #2

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The wave you are referring to can either be a 'continuous wave', which will be going on for ever or it will be a burst or single pulse, lasting for a finite time. The effect on the space it passes through will take the same time interval as the burst / pulse itself. (If you are talking of free, empty space) If your 'space' has anything in it ( even a very rarified gas or plasma) the EM will interact with the medium and some of the energy will be absorbed by the medium and released after a delay. (Probably very short) the original waveform will become dispersed (which is what you refer to, I think)
    You could insert some fancy resonators into your space that would spread the wave out and delay it by a significant amount of time.
     
  4. Sep 15, 2015 #3
    Thanks for your answer. When you say it will be absorbed and then re-released by the medium, in what form would it be re-released? As kinetic energy in the medium, or do you mean that it would be re-released as radiation?
     
  5. Sep 15, 2015 #4

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It depends upon the type of medium and the frequency and intensity of the EM wave. If the medium is my cell phone antenna, then the energy is transformed into the motion of the charges and the electric and magnetic effects from that motion.
     
  6. Sep 16, 2015 #5

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    At least in vacuum, the wave is nothing but electric and magnetic fields. So you can't say there remains anything once a wave has passed.
     
  7. Sep 16, 2015 #6

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    This question can be phrased in terms of a constitutive relation- the response of a material (including 'vacuum') to an applied field. Most commonly-used constitutive relations do not have 'memory' (stochastic processes like this are called 'Markovian'), but it is possible to write down a constitutive equation that has 'fading memory'- stress relaxation and hypoelastic materials are mechanical analogs of this. The constitutive equations are typically of the 'Volterra type', see for example, http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=math
     
  8. Sep 17, 2015 #7

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In most materials (ecluding vacuum) the dielectric function depends on frequency. It can be shown that this corresponds to a fading memory.
     
  9. Sep 17, 2015 #8

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    I'm not sure that's right- my understanding is that the frequency dependence is due to causality- the material cannot respond before the field arrives; alternatively, the Hilbert transform of the Heaviside step function.
     
  10. Sep 17, 2015 #9

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The "fading memory" idea needs to be considered carefully. If there is no actual resonance in the medium, any after effects will only be a 'smearing' of the waveform (dispersion) and not 'ringing' due to the medium.
     
  11. Sep 18, 2015 #10

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Yes and no- for example, optical damage/darkening of a material can be modeled this way (maybe that's a trivial example). Optical bleaching of a fluorophore could be another (silly) example. My point is simply that the current optical response of a material could depend on the past history.
     
  12. Sep 19, 2015 #11

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yes. That's all non linear effects though ( as in photography) and there is no equivalent to a wave being left behind. No remaining 'oscillations' (?).
    I guess that applies to mechanical waves too, when there are no resonances in the structure of the medium.
     
  13. Sep 21, 2015 #12

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    No, that's not what I mean- it's certainly true that it's a nonlinear effect, but the nonlinear susceptibility is usually written as a time-independent thing: harmonic generation 4-wave mixing, stark effect, etc...

    Boyd has a brief blurb about photodamage that's fairly qualitative, Gamaly's book

    https://www.amazon.com/Femtosecond-...raction:+Theory,+Experiments+and+Applications

    Has more information, but modeling the process is still largely phenomenological.
     
  14. Sep 21, 2015 #13

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    How about photochromic sunglasses? That's a temporary effect.
    But all I am suggesting is that there are no (/very few) occasions when the wave leaves behind it some vibrational energy. An example would be interesting. Perhaps a decaying vibration would be enough, as long as it's not just a simple exponential (CR style) decay.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Electromagnetic Radiation in Space
  1. Space by radiation? (Replies: 0)

Loading...