Electromagnetic tensor and restricted Lorentz group

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between the electromagnetic field tensor and the proper orthochronous Lorentz group, exploring the transformation properties of the tensor and its representation within the context of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the electromagnetic field tensor is specifically related to the proper orthochronous Lorentz group.
  • Another participant explains that as a rank 2 tensor, the Faraday tensor transforms under a proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation in a manner consistent with other rank 2 tensors, providing a mathematical expression for this transformation.
  • A subsequent post reiterates the transformation property and seeks clarification on the specific representation of the group, particularly why it is a direct sum of the (1,0) and (0,1) irreducible representations, suggesting a connection to the tensor being a 2-form and its parity invariance.
  • Another participant asserts that the parity invariance is indeed relevant, drawing a parallel to the Dirac field and indicating that this is why the direct sum of elementary irreducible representations is necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the representation of the Lorentz group and its connection to the electromagnetic tensor, with no consensus reached on the specifics of this relationship.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of parity invariance and the specific representation of the Lorentz group, indicating that further clarification may be needed regarding these concepts.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
How exactly is the EM field tensor related to the proper orthochronous Lorentz group?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "related". As a rank 2 tensor, the Faraday tensor transforms under a proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation just like any other rank 2 tensor:

$$F_{\mu'\nu'}=\Lambda^\sigma_{~\mu'}\Lambda^\tau_{~\nu'}F_{\sigma\tau}$$
 
Matterwave said:
What do you mean by "related". As a rank 2 tensor, the Faraday tensor transforms under a proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation just like any other rank 2 tensor:

$$F_{\mu'\nu'}=\Lambda^\sigma_{~\mu'}\Lambda^\tau_{~\nu'}F_{\sigma\tau}$$
I mean the specific representation of the group, why is it the direct sum of the (1,0) and (0,1) irreps, is it related with the tensor being a 2-form and its parity invariance?
 
It has to do with the parity invariance. Just like in the Dirac field case, it's the reason why we need the direct sum of elementary irreducible representations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K