Electromagnetic version of the positive energy theorem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the positive energy theorem and its potential electromagnetic counterpart. The positive energy theorem states that if the energy density T_00 is positive in every local Lorentz frame, the energy inferred from the gravitational field is also positive. The author, Dave, questions whether a similar constraint exists for electromagnetic fields governed by Maxwell's equations when the current J_\mu is future-timelike. The analysis suggests that while a non-negative charge can be inferred from the current density, the presence of spacelike currents in practical scenarios, such as in wires, complicates the applicability of this theorem to electromagnetic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the positive energy theorem in general relativity.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory.
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and local Lorentz frames.
  • Basic concepts of charge density and current density in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the positive energy theorem in general relativity.
  • Explore the relationship between current density and charge in electromagnetic theory.
  • Investigate the role of spacelike currents in practical electromagnetic systems.
  • Study the mathematical formulation of Maxwell's equations in different frames of reference.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on the intersection of general relativity and electromagnetism.

schieghoven
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I've been quite avidly reading about one of the spectacular recent joint achievements of physics and pure math. The positive energy theorem [1,2,3] concerns the large-distance asymptotic behaviour of the gravitational field due to a localised distribution of mass-energy. I think I paraphrase the theorem correctly to say that, provided the source is physical (energy density T_00 is everywhere positive in every local Lorentz frame), then the energy of the system, as inferred from the large-distance gravitational field, is also positive. A neat and powerful result.

I was wondering if a similar result holds for electromagnetic theory. If we take Maxwell's equations and again impose that the source is physical (the current J_\mu is future-timelike), does this place some analogous constraint on the large-distance behaviour of the associated electromagnetic field? This linear system should presumably be much easier than the hard-core nonlinearity of Einstein GR, but nothing obvious jumped out at me.

Thanks,

Dave

* [1] Schoen, R. and Yau, S-T., Commun. Math. Phys, 65 (1979) 45
* [2] Witten, E., Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 381
* [3] Kazdan, J., Seminaire N. Bourbaki, 24 (1982) 315, Exp 593

[3], a review article, is publicly available at http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/browse?j=SB
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the current density is nonzero and future-directed timelike implies that the system's charge (measured either normally or via the asymptotic fields) is non-negative. This is pretty easy to see from the first method:

[tex] q = \int_\Sigma J^a \mathrm{d}S_a > 0.[/tex]

Using Stoke's theorem together with Maxwell's equations shows that this also appears in the field at infinity:

[tex] q = \frac{1}{8\pi} \int_{\partial \Sigma} F^{ab} \mathrm{d}S_{ab} .[/tex]

Unlike in the gravitational case, this kind of restriction on the source is not consistent with observations. Spacelike currents are actually very common. Think of an ordinary wire. There's no net charge, yet there is a 3-current. The 4-current is therefore spacelike. This is possible because there are both positive and negative charges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K