Electromagnetic waves, Maxwell's Equations, Laplace?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of omitting Maxwell's displacement current from Maxwell's Equations. It concludes that in a vacuum, the magnetic field must take the form B = grad f(r,t), where f is a function satisfying the Laplace equation. The participants explore the relationship between the curl of a field and conservative vector fields, confirming that if curl B = 0, then B can be expressed as the gradient of a potential function. The derivation process involves applying Gauss's Law and recognizing the vector identity that the curl of a gradient is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's Equations
  • Familiarity with vector calculus identities
  • Knowledge of the Laplace equation
  • Concept of conservative vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maxwell's Equations and their implications
  • Learn about the properties of conservative vector fields
  • Explore the applications of the Laplace equation in physics
  • Investigate the role of displacement current in electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and researchers interested in the foundational aspects of Maxwell's Equations and their applications in theoretical physics.

tjkubo
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose Maxwell's displacement current was left out of the Maxwell equations. Show that , in a vacuum, the magnetic field has to have the form B = grad f(r,t), where f is any function which satisfies the Laplace equation.


Homework Equations


curl E = - dB/dt
curl B = 0
div E = 0
div B = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


The question requires us to use Maxwell's Equations, however, we're unsure which is the correct starting point. We've already looked very closely at both Gauss's Laws and the Maxwell-Faraday, but are unsure how to derive B = grad f(r,t) from these where f satisfies the Laplace Eqn.

All we know is that if we plug in B = grad f(r,t) into div B = 0, it works, but is that the most general form?
If the curl of a field = 0, doesn't that imply a conservative vector field? Meaning the field has a potential function? Is THAT correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tjkubo said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The question requires us to use Maxwell's Equations, however, we're unsure which is the correct starting point. We've already looked very closely at both Gauss's Laws and the Maxwell-Faraday, but are unsure how to derive B = grad f(r,t) from these where f satisfies the Laplace Eqn.

All we know is that if we plug in B = grad f(r,t) into div B = 0, it works, but is that the most general form?
If the curl of a field = 0, doesn't that imply a conservative vector field? Meaning the field has a potential function? Is THAT correct?

There is the vector identity that says that the curl of the gradient is zero. This is the starting point. From this it follows that B=grad F, and then substituting that into Gauss's Law gives you the Laplace equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K