[Electromagnetics] E-Fields & Equipotential Surfaces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating electric fields (E-fields) and understanding equipotential surfaces in the context of electromagnetics, specifically referencing a problem from "Engineering Electromagnetics" by Hayt & Buck.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the electric field based on potential differences and question whether all relevant equipotential surfaces should be considered in the analysis. There is also a suggestion to visualize the potentials through a graph.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the proximity of equipotential surfaces and the relevance of coordinates.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information regarding the exact coordinates of points and the distances between equipotential surfaces, which may affect the calculations. The participants are also navigating the constraints of the homework assignment.

lonelypancreas
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is from the book Engineering Electromagnetics by Hayt & Buck.[/B]
phphGHczj.png


Homework Equations


E = - (ΔV/ΔL)[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


At part (a), I took the potential difference between point A and the point directly above at the higher surface (106 V) and plugged in the needed values:
E = - (106-104 V)/(2-Ay mm) = - 1000 V/m which is ≠ -1075-Ay V/m.[/B]

Were there things that I have overlooked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonelypancreas said:
Were there things that I have overlooked?
You overlooked that the 102 V equipotential is closer than 2 mm to the 104 V equipotential. You will get a higher magnitude for E if you take that into account.
 
kuruman said:
You overlooked that the 102 V equipotential is closer than 2 mm to the 104 V equipotential.
I think I'm kinda lost.
So do I have to include the potentials from point A with respect to ALL equipotential surfaces? (i.e. 106-104 V, 108-104 V, etc.)? And with respect to the 102-V surface, is the coordinate of the point below point A relevant? If so, how do I get its coordinate?
 
Your calculation give an average value somewhere between the two ep lines considered.
Maybe drawing an V(y) graph will make it clearer?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K