Electron moles present in wire cross-section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the number of moles of electrons per area per second in a wire cross-section. The initial calculation of electron flow, using 7.9C/s and the charge of an electron (1.602E-19 C), leads to a result of 8.1889E5 mol/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using the radius instead of the diameter for area calculations and converting centimeters to meters accurately. The correct approach involves dividing the total moles by the area, which must be computed using the radius in square meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric current and its units (C/s)
  • Knowledge of Avogadro's number (6.022E23)
  • Familiarity with the formula for the area of a circle (A=πr²)
  • Basic unit conversion skills (cm to m)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about electric current calculations in physics
  • Study the concept of moles in chemistry and its applications
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for scientific calculations
  • Investigate the significance of significant figures in scientific results
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and chemistry, particularly those involved in electrical engineering and materials science, will benefit from this discussion.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See image
Relevant Equations
I=C/t
So I know current is just coulombs/second. Electrons are also in the unit of coulombs, so I can get coulombs to cancel.

7.9C/s/1.602E-29C = 4.93133E29 1/s

Now I just need to get mol on top. There are 6.022E23 electron in a mol so 4.93133E29 1/s / 6.022E23 atoms/mol = 8.1889E5 mol/s.

Now my problem is that I don't know what to do with the diameter. My only hint is that the units also have m^2, which could imply that I need to multiply the above by area? So using A=pir^2 I would get an area of 0.5027 m^2. Obviously multiplying this value by the above value won't get me the right answer.

What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • Wire.PNG
    Wire.PNG
    7 KB · Views: 174
Physics news on Phys.org
They want to know the number of moles per area per second. It should be obvious that you divide by the area.
You need to convert the centimeters to meters in computing the area. The number you give for the area is way off.
 
Charles Link said:
They want to know the number of moles per area per second. It should be obvious that you divide by the area.
You need to convert the centimeters to meters in computing the area. The number you give for the area is way off.

Youre right, but even if I divide instead of multiply the area I still get the wrong answer. The answer is 1.63, but ill get 1629129.9. So its right but has too many digits it seems.
 
Okay i forgot to convert the cm too, but when I convert it to m and divide by area I get an answer that's even bigger and also wrong (4.07 E11)
 
The electron charge is 1.602E-19 .(not E-29).
Make sure you use the radius of the wire (rather than the diameter) in computing the area. =Edit=looks like you did. You then divide by the area. You should get the correct answer.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
The electron charge is 1.602E-19 .(not E-29).
Make sure you use the radius of the wire (rather than the diameter) in computing the area. You should get the correct answer.

So then I get 8.1991 E-5for mol/s. Dividing by area still doesn't work for me.

0.4cm = 0.0004 m. A=pir^2 = 0.000000502.

0.000081889/0.000000502 = 163, which is too large by a factor of 100.
 
You would do better to use exponential notation. But the ## r=.004 ## m. I think everything then works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
Charles Link said:
You would do better to use exponential notation. But the ## r=.004 ## m. I think everything then works.

Yeah I am dumb. cm is not mm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K