Electron's magnetic moment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expression for the electron's magnetic moment as presented in Peskin and Schroeder's book, specifically on page 187. The expression involves the electron form factors and is given by $$\bar{u}(p')\left(\gamma^i F_1(q^2)+\frac{i \sigma^{i\nu}q_\nu}{2m}F_2(q^2)\right)u(p)$$. It is established that this expression vanishes at ##\vec{q}=0##, leading to the simplified form $$\bar{u}(p')\gamma^i u(p)$$, where ##F_1(0)=1##. The key point of contention is understanding why this expression must equal zero in the limit of zero momentum transfer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) fundamentals
  • Understanding of Dirac spinors and gamma matrices
  • Familiarity with form factors in particle physics
  • Knowledge of on-shell conditions in relativistic quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electron form factors in Quantum Electrodynamics
  • Explore the implications of the Ward-Takahashi identity on form factors
  • Learn about the physical significance of the magnetic moment in particle physics
  • Investigate the role of momentum transfer in scattering processes
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying Quantum Electrodynamics who seek a deeper understanding of the electron's magnetic moment and its mathematical representation.

Gaussian97
Homework Helper
Messages
683
Reaction score
412
TL;DR
Show that ##\bar{u}(p')\left(\gamma^i F_1(q^2)+\frac{i \sigma^{i\nu}q_\nu}{2m}F_2(q^2)\right)u(p)=0## for ##\vec{q}=0##
Is Peskin and Schroeder book, page 187 when they try to connect the electron form factors to its magnetic moment they get the expression
$$\bar{u}(p')\left(\gamma^i F_1(q^2)+\frac{i \sigma^{i\nu}q_\nu}{2m}F_2(q^2)\right)u(p)$$
Where ##p##, ##p'## are the momenta on on-shell electrons and ##q=p'-p##.
And they say that this vanishes at ##\vec{q}=0##.

I see that, because ##p,p'## are on-shell ##\vec{q}=0 \Longrightarrow q^0=0## so in this limit the expression is
$$\bar{u}(p')\gamma^i u(p)$$
Because ##F_1(0)=1##. But I can't see why this must be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K