Elementary reaction's order of reaction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the order of elementary reactions in chemistry, specifically addressing why the order is equal to the summation of stoichiometric coefficients. Participants also explore the implications of balancing chemical equations and the preference for certain sets of coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the order of elementary reactions corresponds to the summation of stoichiometric coefficients, questioning the reasoning behind this.
  • One participant argues that for first-order reactions, only the coefficient of one reactant is relevant, suggesting that the reaction rate is independent of other reactants' concentrations.
  • There is a discussion about the preference for balancing equations with the smallest integer coefficients, with one participant stating that the middle equation in a given set is conventionally considered the correct one.
  • Some participants express curiosity about the underlying physics of why elementary reactions follow the stated conventions, with one noting that non-integer coefficients do not make sense in the context of elementary reactions.
  • Another participant explains that elementary reactions occur in a single step and that the rate equations for these reactions derive from their definition, highlighting the relationship between molecular collisions and reaction rates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of stoichiometric coefficients and their implications for reaction rates. While some agree on the conventions for balancing equations, others question the rationale behind these conventions and the nature of elementary reactions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that balancing equations can yield different sets of stoichiometric coefficients, leading to discussions about which set is preferred. There is also mention of the limitations of using non-integer coefficients in the context of elementary reactions.

Tahmeed
Messages
81
Reaction score
4
According to textbook, elementary reactions have an order of reaction equal to the summation of the stoichiometric coefficients. why is this so?

And there is another problem, we can balance an equation in different ways and get different stoichiometric coefficient sets, for rates, which set is prefered?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Not necessarily, if the reaction is first order, it only involves the coefficient of one reactant. The reaction rate is independent of the concentration of the other reactant. As far as I know, there is only one way to balance a reaction.
 
Tahmeed said:
According to textbook, elementary reactions have an order of reaction equal to the summation of the stoichiometric coefficients. why is this so?

That's true for elementary reactions. In most cases the overall stoichiometry of a process (one that we describe with a reaction equation) is different.

And there is another problem, we can balance an equation in different ways and get different stoichiometric coefficient sets, for rates, which set is prefered?

The one in which all coefficients are the smallest integer numbers possible. So of the three reaction equations:

H2 + ½O2 → H2O

2H2 + O2 → 2H2O

4H2 + 2O2 → 4H2O

the middle one is - by convention - considered "the right one".
 
Borek said:
That's true for elementary reactions. In most cases the overall stoichiometry of a process (one that we describe with a reaction equation) is different.
The one in which all coefficients are the smallest integer numbers possible. So of the three reaction equations:

H2 + ½O2 → H2O

2H2 + O2 → 2H2O

4H2 + 2O2 → 4H2O

the middle one is - by convention - considered "the right one".

That's true. But why exactly it is so? why elementary reactions follow this? what is the physics behind this?
 
It's not physics, but convention. Chemists don't like 1/2 coefficients in stoichiometry, because 1/2 of a molecule doesn't exist (for long). And the balanced equation is always reduced to its lowest common factor.
 
Tahmeed said:
That's true. But why exactly it is so? why elementary reactions follow this? what is the physics behind this?

Elementary reactions are reactions that occur in a single step with no intermediates. In the reaction equations, you would interpret them as saying, in your example, x molecules of hydrogen react with y molecules of oxygen. Obviously, non-integer coefficients do not make sense in this context. Similarly, unless four molecules of hydrogen and two oxygen molecules must all come together at one place to make two water molecules, this is not an elementary reaction.

In terms of reaciton kinetics, the rate equation follows from the definition of an elementary reaction as a reaction occurring in a single step. For a unimolecular reaction (A --> P), the rate is just v = k[A]. Each molecule of A has the same probability of reacting per unit time, so the more A that is present, the more molecules of A will undergo the reaction (though the same fraction of molecules of A will under go the reaction per unit time).

For bimolecular reactions to occur, the molecules involved in the reaction must first collide. The rate of collision is just the product of the concentration of two reactants. So if it's A + C--> P, then v = k[A][C] or if the reaction is 2A --> P, then v = k[A]2. Trimolecular reactions follow a similar logic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K