Eletrostatics in conductors: Find the capacity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance coefficients of two conductors, C1 and C2, separated by a distance d, using the fundamental principles of electrostatics. The correct capacitance coefficients are derived as follows: C_{11} = (4πε₀d)²C1 / ((4πε₀d)² - C1C2) and C_{22} = (4πε₀d)²C2 / ((4πε₀d)² - C1C2). The participants clarify the relationship between charge, potential, and capacitance, emphasizing the need for accurate matrix inversion to obtain the correct results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with capacitance and potential relationships
  • Matrix algebra for solving linear equations
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas in electrostatics
  • Learn about matrix inversion techniques in linear algebra
  • Explore applications of capacitance in circuit design
  • Review the role of ε₀ (permittivity of free space) in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electrostatics and capacitance calculations.

tsuwal
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider two conductors with capacity C1 and C2, separated by a distance d sufficiently large, so that each conductor can be considered as pontual, when observed by the other. Find the capacity coeficients and the capacity of the capacitor thereby formed.

Homework Equations


This problem is related to what my teacher calls the fundamental problem of eletrostatics:
- When given n conductors with know potencials, we want to calculate its charges. The charges of each conductor depend linearly on the potencials of the conductors such that:
Charge of conductor k=\sum_{i=1}^{n}S_{ik}V_i, where S_ik is the potencial coefficient and V_i is the potencial of conductor i

- When given n conductors with know charges, we want to calculate its potencials. The potencial of each conductor depend linearly on the charges of the conductors such that:
POtencial of conductor k=\sum_{i=1}^{n}C_{ik}q_i, where C_ik is the capacity coeffient and q_i is the charge of the conductor i

The Attempt at a Solution

How do I solve this? I tried this way:
<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> S_{11} &amp;S_{12} \\ <br /> S_{21} &amp; S_{22}<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> V_1\\ <br /> V_2<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{C_1} &amp; \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0d}\\ <br /> \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0d}&amp; \frac{1}{C_2}<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> V_1\\ <br /> V_2<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =\begin{bmatrix}<br /> q_1\\ <br /> q_2<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
I assumed S_11=1/C_1 and S_22=1/C_2 and S_12=S_12=1/4pi*epsilon*d

However, the answer I get from inverting this matrix is not the right answer. The right answer is:
C_{11}=\frac{(4\pi\epsilon_0d)^{2}C_1}{(4\pi\epsilon_0d)^{2}-C_1C_2};<br /> <br /> C_{22}=\frac{(4\pi\epsilon_0d)^{2}C_2}{(4\pi\epsilon_0d)^{2}-C_1C_2};<br /> <br /> C_{12}=C_{21}=-\frac{4\pi\epsilon_0dC_2C_1}{(4\pi\epsilon_0d)^{2}-C_1C_2}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Give me a moment to correct latex, sorry :P
 
Oh my god, the latex was right. I don't understand. Can anyone see it?
 
Hello Tsuwal,

Yes, I can see your Latex.

Concerning the content of the matrix, are you absolutely sure of it?

If you have a conductor with self capacitance Q, what's the relation between charge and potential?

J.
 
Actually, scratch it: the matrix is right, but what you wrote is not correct: what's the relation between capacitance, charge and potential?
 
capacitance=charge/potencial but I still can't get there.
 
Tsuwal, slightly rephrased, that's correct:

Capacitance times potential = charge​

However, that's not what you wrote in your equation.

Your equation should look line:


<br /> \left [ <br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> S_{11} &amp; S_{12} \\<br /> S_{21} &amp; S_{22}\end{array}<br /> \right ]<br /> \left [ \begin{array}{c}<br /> q_1 \\<br /> q_2 \end{array}\right ] = \left [ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{C_1} &amp; \frac{1}{4\,\pi\,\epsilon_{0}\,d} \\<br /> \frac{1}{4\,\pi\,\epsilon_{0}\,d} &amp; \frac{1}{C_2}\end{array}\right ] \left [ \begin{array}{c}<br /> q_1 \\<br /> q_2 \end{array}\right ] = \left [ \begin{array}{c}<br /> V_1 \\<br /> V_2 \end{array}\right ]<br />

And thus

<br /> S^{-1} = C<br />

I did the inversion of your S matrix and found:

<br /> \left[\begin{array}{rr}<br /> \frac{16 \, \pi^{2} C_{1} d^{2} e_{0}^{2}}{16 \, \pi^{2} d^{2} e_{0}^{2} - C_{1} C_{2}} &amp; -\frac{4 \, \pi C_{1} C_{2} d e_{0}}{16 \, \pi^{2} d^{2} e_{0}^{2} - C_{1} C_{2}} \\<br /> -\frac{4 \, \pi C_{1} C_{2} d e_{0}}{16 \, \pi^{2} d^{2} e_{0}^{2} - C_{1} C_{2}} &amp; \frac{16 \, \pi^{2} C_{2} d^{2} e_{0}^{2}}{16 \, \pi^{2} d^{2} e_{0}^{2} - C_{1} C_{2}}<br /> \end{array}\right]<br />

So whatever error you have, it's in the computation of the inverse.

Hope this helps!

J.
 
You are right! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K