Elevator 2 part Question - Box Dragging

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larrytsai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Elevator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an elevator accelerating upwards and the forces acting on a box within it. Participants are exploring how to determine the minimum force required to move the box while the elevator is in motion, focusing on concepts such as normal force and the effects of acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using free body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the box, questioning how the elevator's acceleration affects the normal force and the box's weight. There is also a focus on understanding the relationship between normal force and weight.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the role of the elevator's acceleration in determining the normal force. Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and relationships between the forces involved, while others seek clarification on the formulas needed to find the normal force.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a recent test experience where one participant received feedback on their understanding of normal force calculations, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge regarding the application of physics principles in this context.

Larrytsai
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
If an elevator accelerates upwards at say about 1.96m/s/s, and say I need to find what the minimum force is required to move the box while the elevator is in motion. Would I find the force of the elevator (using F=ma) moving upwards and add it to the boxes weight and then the total weight of the force of elevator and weight of box would be my Fn. If everything is correct so far... How do I figure out how much force is needed to pull the box?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Larrytsai said:
If an elevator accelerates upwards at say about 1.96m/s/s, and say I need to find what the minimum force is required to move the box while the elevator is in motion. Would I find the force of the elevator (using F=ma) moving upwards and add it to the boxes weight and then the total weight of the force of elevator and weight of box would be my Fn. If everything is correct so far... How do I figure out how much force is needed to pull the box?

There are ways to get the right answer following the lines you describe but the real way to do it is to start from a Free body diagram.
The force required to get it to move (assuming the force is horizontal ) is [itex]\mu_s N[/itex] where N is the normal force. To find the normal force on the box, use [tex]\sum F_y = m a_y[/tex] This is where the acceleration of the elevator will come into play. the box obviously has the same vertical acceleration as the elevator. from this, find the normal force on the box.
 
nrqed said:
There are ways to get the right answer following the lines you describe but the real way to do it is to start from a Free body diagram.
The force required to get it to move (assuming the force is horizontal ) is [itex]\mu_s N[/itex] where N is the normal force. To find the normal force on the box, use [tex]\sum F_y = m a_y[/tex] This is where the acceleration of the elevator will come into play. the box obviously has the same vertical acceleration as the elevator. from this, find the normal force on the box.

I was wondering would the acceleration of the elevator affect the weight of the box?, and isn't Fn=W because of Newtons law?
 
Larrytsai said:
I was wondering would the acceleration of the elevator affect the weight of the box?, and isn't Fn=W because of Newtons law?

The weight of the box is simply mg and it does nto depend on anything (as long as you don't go in outer space!). what is affected by the acceleration of the elevator is the normal force on the box. *Sometimes* people call the normal force the "apparent weight" of an object which is a source of confusion.
 
thnx a lot for the help.
I have one more short question.
Would the weight of the elevator come to be use in this question or should i just leave the weight of elevator alone and just use its mass?
 
Larrytsai said:
thnx a lot for the help.
I have one more short question.
Would the weight of the elevator come to be use in this question or should i just leave the weight of elevator alone and just use its mass?

You are welcome.

If you just want the force required to move the box you don't need at all the mass or weight of the elevator itself. It plays no role. You just need the vertical acceleration in order to find the normal force on the box. What ou do need is the mass of the *box*.
 
nrqed said:
You are welcome.

If you just want the force required to move the box you don't need at all the mass or weight of the elevator itself. It plays no role. You just need the vertical acceleration in order to find the normal force on the box. What ou do need is the mass of the *box*.

umm yea i just had my test and i asked my teacher how to find Fn of the box. I told him i used Fn=ma he said it was wrong. can u tell me what formulas used to find fn
 
Larrytsai said:
umm yea i just had my test and i asked my teacher how to find Fn of the box. I told him i used Fn=ma he said it was wrong. can u tell me what formulas used to find fn

By fn you mean the normal force?

I said in my post number 2 to draw a free body diagram and to apply [tex]\sum F_y = m a_y[/tex]. You never commented on this so I assumed you knew how to do this. What are the forces along y acting on the box?
 
nrqed said:
By fn you mean the normal force?

I said in my post number 2 to draw a free body diagram and to apply [tex]\sum F_y = m a_y[/tex]. You never commented on this so I assumed you knew how to do this. What are the forces along y acting on the box?

O LOL my teacher never taught me what y was... but i did draw the free body diagram and by Fn i do mean normal Force, but i didnt use the sigma the sum of forces
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K