B Elevator Question -- What does a downward acceleration mean?

AI Thread Summary
A downward acceleration in an upward-moving elevator indicates that the elevator is ascending but decelerating, preparing to stop at a higher floor. When applying a free body diagram, the positive direction can be defined as upwards, which is recommended for clarity. In this context, the upward velocity remains positive while the downward acceleration is negative. It is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen coordinate system for accurate calculations. Thus, a downward acceleration of 1.4 m/s² would be represented as -1.4 m/s² when up is defined as positive.
jwviviang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean? When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jwviviang said:
TL;DR Summary: I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)

If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller, vanhees71 and russ_watters
jwviviang said:
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.
 
  • Like
Likes jwviviang and vanhees71
A.T. said:
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.

Dale said:
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
 
jwviviang said:
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
Yes, in the usual setup with up being positive.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top