B Elevator Question -- What does a downward acceleration mean?

AI Thread Summary
A downward acceleration in an upward-moving elevator indicates that the elevator is ascending but decelerating, preparing to stop at a higher floor. When applying a free body diagram, the positive direction can be defined as upwards, which is recommended for clarity. In this context, the upward velocity remains positive while the downward acceleration is negative. It is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen coordinate system for accurate calculations. Thus, a downward acceleration of 1.4 m/s² would be represented as -1.4 m/s² when up is defined as positive.
jwviviang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean? When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jwviviang said:
TL;DR Summary: I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)

If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller, vanhees71 and russ_watters
jwviviang said:
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.
 
  • Like
Likes jwviviang and vanhees71
A.T. said:
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.

Dale said:
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
 
jwviviang said:
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
Yes, in the usual setup with up being positive.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top