Eliot Spitzer Linked to Prostitution Ring

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chemisttree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the allegations linking New York Governor Eliot Spitzer to a prostitution ring, as reported by the New York Times. Participants explore the implications of these allegations, Spitzer's past actions as attorney general, and the potential political fallout, including speculation about his resignation and its impact on the political landscape.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the credibility of the New York Times report, suggesting it could be misleading.
  • Others highlight Spitzer's previous strong stance against prostitution, questioning the contradiction between his past actions and current allegations.
  • A participant notes the potential political ramifications, including speculation about Spitzer's resignation and its effects on the Democratic Party.
  • Concerns are raised about the media coverage of the scandal and its overshadowing of other political news, particularly during election season.
  • Some participants reflect on Spitzer's character and past behavior as attorney general, suggesting he may face similar scrutiny as he did to others.
  • There is speculation about the implications of the scandal for potential political alliances, particularly regarding Hillary Clinton.
  • A participant discusses the strategic considerations for politicians involved in scandals, emphasizing the importance of party dynamics and public perception.
  • Another participant mentions the investigation's origins in a tax inquiry, suggesting that Spitzer's financial activities may have raised red flags.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the implications of the allegations or Spitzer's future. Some agree on the seriousness of the situation, while others focus on the political maneuvering that may follow.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various aspects of Spitzer's political career and the nature of scandals, indicating a complex interplay of ethics, public perception, and party politics. The discussion reflects a variety of assumptions about the motivations and consequences of political actions.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in political scandals, media influence on public perception, and the dynamics of party politics may find this discussion relevant.

chemisttree
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,954
Reaction score
777
The New York Governor, Eliot Spitzer (D) has been linked to a prostitution ring as reported in the New York Times (and thus it could all be a big lie). As attorney general in 2003, Spitzer
...spoke with revulsion about prostitution after he brought suit against a Queens company suspected of planning sex tourism trips to Asia.

The agency, Big Apple Oriental Tours, had been accused in a lawsuit brought in July 2003 by Spitzer of arranging tours for men seeking sex with prostitutes, some underage, in the Philippines, Thailand and Cambodia.

"The company purports to be a traditional travel agency, but through its actions promotes prostitution and the abuse of young women," Spitzer told reporters after suing the company. "This suit seeks a halt to this egregious conduct."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/nyregion/10cnd-spitzer.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

It seems very unlike the Eliot Spitzer that said upon his inauguration
"Every policy, every action and every decision we make in this administration will further two overarching objectives: We must transform our government so that it is as ethical and wise as all of New York, and we must rebuild our economy so that it is ready to compete on the global stage in the next century".

Thanks for the 'transformation', Eliot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully, he will continue to throw Hillary Clinton his enthusiastic support.:smile:
 
Politicians are ****heads. No news here.

- Warren
 
Ugh, I hope this doesn't get buried under all the primary and election "news". These matters deserve serious attention. Either you clear his name entirely or find him guilty.
 
Spitzer was already on my black list for his "licenses for illegals" scam.
 
chemisttree said:
The New York Governor, Eliot Spitzer (D) has been linked to a prostitution ring as reported in the New York Times (and thus it could all be a big lie).
Hey - once in a while the NY Times gets it right! :smile:

The story has been given wide distribution - and Spitzer apologized to his family and the public. Well, at least he didn't deny it.


Apparently the feds have him on tape - Client 9 - arranging a rendezvous ($4300) at a hotel in Washington. And apparently Client 9 is a repeat customer.
 
I can just see the ads now: Hooker $4,300 , Catch a politician doing the nasty, priceless. Master Card
 
He's probably going to resign in the morning, making David Peterson the first legally blind governor.
 
Has he no shame? Now he's ruined it for all of us.
 
  • #10
client8 said:
Has he no shame? Now he's ruined it for all of us.

:smile::smile::smile:

"Every policy, every action and every decision we make in this administration will further two overarching objectives: We must transform our government so that it is as ethical and wise as all of New York, and we must rebuild our economy so that it is ready to compete on the global stage in the next century".
As long as she was wearing a "Made in America" sticker, I don't see any problem.
 
  • #11
turbo-1 said:
Hopefully, he will continue to throw Hillary Clinton his enthusiastic support.:smile:

When interviewed about it, Hillary looked totally off-balance. She really looked ill.
Could Eliot have been her potential running mate? He was certainly on a trajectory to the White House... I guess the Mayflower will have to do.
 
  • #12
Some news sites are now posting that Spitzer is expected to resign.
 
  • #13
chemisttree said:
When interviewed about it, Hillary looked totally off-balance. She really looked ill.
Could Eliot have been her potential running mate? He was certainly on a trajectory to the White House... I guess the Mayflower will have to do.
It still could work. Hillary for Prez and Spitzer for Vice.
 
  • #14
That would certainly cinch it for Obama.
 
  • #15
chemisttree said:
Could Eliot have been her potential running mate?

The senator and governor of a very blue state, running together? Not a chance, IMO. Attorney General, maybe, but not her running mate.
 
  • #16
Astronuc said:
Some news sites are now posting that Spitzer is expected to resign.

He violated two critical rules of sex scandals.

Don't get caught in a sex scandal when the opposing party controls at least one of the branches of legislature. Republicans control New York's Senate. (On the positive side, there's so few Republicans in the New York House that he'll never get impeached the way Clinton did). Spitzer could presumably face some kind of censure by a Republican New York Senate, just as Larry Craig was censured by a Democratic controlled Ethics Committee.

Don't get caught in a sex scandal when your replacement would be from the same party. Fellow party members are much more supportive when a member of the opposing party would be your replacement. David Vitter received much more sympathy from fellow Republicans and support for him staying in office in a state where a Democratic governor would name the replacement for a Republican Senator that resigned from office. Larry Craig received practically no support from fellow Republicans when his replacement would almost surely be another Republican.

If you're going to get involved in a sex scandal in spite of your possible replacement being from the same party, at least do it in a state so heavily tilted in your own party's favor that the opposing party can do nothing more than yell. Sure, Jim McGreevy may have eventually resigned early, but he was able to hang on long enough to ensure he was replaced by a fellow Democrat instead of forcing a special election that could be won by a Republican (in other words, it's almost the same as the previous rule).

It's probably best to get involved in a scandal in a state that has a long history of scandals. David Vitter simply displayed once again the truth that Louisiana seems to understand much better than the rest of the country - when it comes to scandals, the secret is practice, practice, practice!
 
  • #17
Revelations Began in Routine Tax Inquiry (which was far from routine)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/nyregion/11inquire.html
There, in the Hauppauge offices of the Internal Revenue Service, investigators conducting a routine examination of suspicious financial transactions reported to them by banks found several unusual movements of cash involving the governor of New York, several officials said.

The investigators working out of the three-story office building, which faces Veterans Highway, typically review such reports, the officials said. But this was not typical: transactions by a governor who appeared to be trying to conceal the source, destination or purpose of the movement of thousands of dollars in cash, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Spitzer needs to resign. His first year as governor was poor, and his actions have compromised what little effectiveness he had.
 
  • #18
I just passed the NY State Capitol building. It's surrounded by news vans.
 
  • #19
Hey everyone, I am "new" here. I actually was registered on PF 2.0, I think it was, but never renewed.

Anyways, this man totally changed after he officially took office. He did not follow through on many of his promises, he tried to undermine and drag his opponents' names through the mud using very questionable methods, and now this? I hope he resigns. If not, we can only hope he is impeached.

If you kept track of his career as Attorney General, you would know he was ruthless and did not give people the benefit of the doubt or a second chance. Perhaps he should be shown the same.
 
  • #20
This makes me wonder what the names of clients 1 thru 8 might be.

A Web site (www.emperorsclubvip.com) connected a worldwide web of wealthy and powerful men with a social network of high-priced prostitutes. The Emperors Club VIP Web site? A social search engine for the anachronistic term "call girls."
The embattled search engine Yahoo provided a convenient e-mail address: emperorsclubvipny@yahoo.com.

American Express was apparently the unofficial "official card" of The Emperors Club VIP. FBI wiretaps found numerous references to American Express in conversations between the defendants and prostitutes.

Time Warner Cable and Internet service providers (ISPs) turned over evidence and connected individuals to their e-mail accounts and personal computers.

The prostitution ring, identified in court papers as the Emperors Club VIP, arranged connections between wealthy men and more than 50 prostitutes in New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Miami, London and Paris.

http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3628701

Spitzer's name may only be the first of many to pop out of this can of worms.
 
  • #21
lisab said:
The senator and governor of a very blue state, running together? Not a chance, IMO. Attorney General, maybe, but not her running mate.

There's also the Constitution to worry about. Electors cannot vote for both President and Vice-President from their state. A Clinton-New Yorker ticket would mean that the VP candidate would start out 31 votes behind. In a close race, this could make the difference - you might have a GOP VP!
 
  • #22
I get "Sorry, the site you requested has been disabled." when I click on the link http://www.emperorsclubvip.com/ . Good work!

So much for the fear mongers out there afraid of what Homeland Security might find with their so-called warrantless wiretapping. The ISP's and Time Warner turned over evidence to investigators connecting e-mails with individuals and their computers.

Lesson: There is no anonymity on the internet.
 
  • #23
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
chemisttree said:
I get "Sorry, the site you requested has been disabled." when I click on the link http://www.emperorsclubvip.com/ . Good work!

So much for the fear mongers out there afraid of what Homeland Security might find with their so-called warrantless wiretapping. The ISP's and Time Warner turned over evidence to investigators connecting e-mails with individuals and their computers.

Lesson: There is no anonymity on the internet.

Perhaps you could send them an e-mail at emperorsclubvipny@yahoo.com.


ISP's routinely sell your browsing information to companies such as ChoicePoint and Entersect, who in turn combine it with public information and sell data bases to local law enforcement agencies. The information is highly error prone.

I had a friend run my local police record. It shows that I am married to my son's ex wife. .
 
Last edited:
  • #25
chemisttree said:
So much for the fear mongers out there afraid of what Homeland Security might find with their so-called warrantless wiretapping.

Fear mongering is to argue that we live in such a dangerous world that we have to trash the constitution. We made it through fifty years of Soviet nukes pointed at us but still managed to preserve the law.

Are Americans are now such cowards that we can no longer live in a free society where liberties are protected?
 
Last edited:
  • #26
lisab said:
The senator and governor of a very blue state, running together? Not a chance, IMO. Attorney General, maybe, but not her running mate.

I don't remember what i was watching, but Hillary sounded as if she was saying Dem's might get the chance to vote for both:confused: might she have meant that no matter which won, the other might become the running mate as VP ?
 
  • #27
RonL said:
I don't remember what i was watching, but Hillary sounded as if she was saying Dem's might get the chance to vote for both:confused: might she have meant that no matter which won, the other might become the running mate as VP ?
Clinton, in 2nd place, is threatening to strong-arm pledged delegates and super-delegates to deny Obama the nomination. She was coyly offering him a VP slot on HER ticket. It is not at all likely that Obama would offer her the VP slot, IMO, because she would bring very high negatives to the ticket, and he would be exposing his administration to the Clinton-style infighting and divisiveness that runs counter to his image. A more likely VP would be John Edwards, and I wish that he could announce such a ticket prior to the PA primary.
 
Last edited:
  • #28
chemisttree said:
When interviewed about it, Hillary looked totally off-balance. She really looked ill.
Could Eliot have been her potential running mate? He was certainly on a trajectory to the White House... I guess the Mayflower will have to do.
No, she probably looked off-balance because it made her have flashbacks. That's what Jim McGreevy's wife commented when asked about it.
 
  • #29
jimmysnyder said:
One just needs to move out of state. That's what Cheyney did in 2000.

Easy if you're a private citizen. Harder if you are a sitting governor or a serving senator.
 
  • #30
Vanadium 50 said:
Easy if you're a private citizen. Harder if you are a sitting governor or a serving senator.
Good point, but he may have to stand up pretty soon. And with the old battleax standing there with a frying pan in her hand, a hasty change of scenery may be advisable for the former Governor. Clinton has experience with this stuff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K