Emag - Having trouble following an example

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 5K views
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble following an example in the book. I don't understand a few steps which I have marked in bold. Any help would be awesome! Thanks.

Q: In vacuum-tube diodes, electrons are emitted from a hot cathode at zero potential and collected by an anode maintained at a potential [itex]V_0[/itex], resulting in a convection current flow. Assuming that the cathode and the anode are parallel conducting plates and that hte electrons leave the cathode with a zero initial velocity (spache-charge limited condition), find the relation between the current density [itex]\vec C[/itex] and [itex]V_0[/itex].

A:
Neglecting fringing effects we have,
[tex]\vec E(0) = \vec a_y E_y(0) = -\vec a_y \frac{dV(y=0)}{dy} = 0[/tex]

In the steady state the current density is constant, independent of y:
[tex]\vec J = -\vec a_y J = \vec a_y \rho(y) u(y)[/tex]
where the charge density [itex]\rho (y)[/itex] is a negative quanitity. The velocity [itex]\vec u = \vec a_y u(y)[/itex] is related to the electric field intensity [itex]\vec E(y) = \vec a_y E(y)[/itex] by Newton's law of motion:
[tex]m \vec{d u(y)}{dt} = -eE(y) = e \vec{dV(y)}{dy}[/tex], where [itex]m[/itex] and [itex]e[/itex] are the mass and charge respectively of an electron. Noting that:

This is where I am confused. I am not noting anything =)

[tex]m \frac{du}{dt} = m \frac{du}{dy} \frac{dy}{dt} = mu \frac{du}{dy}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} mu^2 \right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) = e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]

I don't understand:
[tex]m \frac{du}{dy} \frac{dy}{dt} \rightarrow mu \frac{du}{dy}[/tex]
[tex]mu \frac{du}{dy} \rightarrow \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} mu^2 \right)[/tex]

and last but not least...
[tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) \rightarrow e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This [itex]\vec{a_y}[/itex] business is very confusing. Apparently, [itex]\vec{a_y}[/itex] is just a unit vector in the y direction. There's a symbol for that, it's [itex]\vec{j}[/itex] or [itex]\hat{y}[/itex].

For your first source of confusion:

According to the equations of kinematics,

[tex]u(t)=at[/itex]<br /> [tex]y(t)=\frac{a}{2}t^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> So if you want to write u as a function of y only, it will look like<br /> <br /> [tex]u(y)=\sqrt{2ay}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now,<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{du}{dt}=\frac{du}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{du}{dy}\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{a}{2}t^2)=\frac{du}{dy}at=\frac{du}{dy}u[/tex]For the second:<br /> <br /> [tex]u \frac{du}{dy} = \frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} u^2 \right)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Just differentiate the RHS to see that it is true.Third confusion:<br /> <br /> [itex]\frac{1}{2}mu^2[/itex] is the kinetic energy of an electron. And by conservation of energy, we must have <br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{dK}{dy}=-\frac{dU}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> where U is the potential energy of the electron. But for a charge q, U(y) is also qV(y). Here, q=-e, hence U(y)=-eV(y) and we have<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{dK}{dy}=e\frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> This is what <br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{d}{dy} \left( \frac{1}{2} m u^2 \right) = e \frac{dV}{dy}[/tex]<br /> <br /> is expressing.[/tex]
 
ahhhhhhh... I feel like slapping myself ;)

I haven't seen those kinematic equations in awhile, hehe.

Well this question was an awesome review.

quasar987 I can't thank you enough. You are always a huge help!