Trouble following the derivation of Scott and Viner 1965

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter achmorrison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the derivation of expressions for spatial coordinates in the context of the Scott and Viner 1965 paper, "The Geometrical Appearance of Large Objects Moving at Relativistic Speeds." The user struggles to derive the expression for x from the Lorentz transformation after successfully obtaining the expression for time, t. The key equations discussed include t = -[(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}-d]/c and x'=\gamma(x-vt). The user expresses frustration at the lack of clarity in existing literature regarding the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with the concepts of relativistic speeds and gamma factor (γ)
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation and solving equations
  • Experience with matrix inversion or systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Review the concept of the gamma factor (γ) and its implications in relativity
  • Learn about matrix inversion techniques in the context of physics
  • Examine other papers that reference Scott and Viner for additional insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focused on special relativity, as well as anyone attempting to understand complex derivations in theoretical physics.

achmorrison
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading the Scott and Viner AJP paper from 1965 "The Geometrical Appearance of Large Objects Moving at Relativistic Speeds" and I am having a little trouble following their derivation of the expression for x in the appendix of the paper.

I understand how they get the expression for t:

[tex]t = -[(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}-d]/c[/tex]

Which they put into the Lorentz transformation for x':

[tex]x'=\gamma(x-vt)=\gamma[x+\beta[(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}-d]][/tex]

But, then they say that they want to get an expression for x, y, z in terms of x',y',z' which implies that they just solve the above expression for x. But, when I do that, I don't get anything at all like what they get.

I have looked at dozens of papers that reference this one and they all just start with Scott and Viner's results with no discussion of how they get there.

I feel like I'm missing something very simple, but I just don't see it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't read the paper, but it sounds to me like you're trying to find the inverse of a matrix (or equivalently: solve a system of equations) by only looking at one of the rows (one of the equations).
 
Right, that's what I'm trying to do, but I don't get their result:

[tex]x= \gamma((x'+\gamma\beta d)-\beta[(x'+\gamma\beta d)^2+y'^2+(z'-d)^2]^{1/2})[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K