This discussion centers on the legitimacy of targets for resistance forces, particularly in the context of the Iraq conflict. Participants analyze various insurgent actions, questioning whether police forces and off-duty military personnel should be considered legitimate targets. The consensus suggests that while armed forces and military infrastructure are valid targets, civilian casualties should be avoided, and the moral implications of targeting government officials are debated. The conversation also touches on the historical context of warfare and the evolving definitions of legitimate targets.
PREREQUISITESPolitical scientists, military strategists, human rights advocates, and anyone interested in the ethical considerations of warfare and resistance movements.
Quite frankly, I haven't looked at this thread in 2 days. I did not expect you to actually state your opinion. Here it is:Art said:
I thank you for clarifying and do not wish to discuss it further with you at this time.
It seems this is how you win debates on this forum...russ_watters said:Deleted: by ART
