EMF induced in a rotating rod having mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the electromotive force (emf) induced in a rotating rod with mass, exploring concepts related to torque and current in the context of rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of induced emf and torque, questioning the implications of the rod rotating at constant angular velocity. There are inquiries about the relationship between torque and induced current, as well as the need for a free body diagram to analyze the forces involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's posts, seeking clarification on the concepts of torque balance and the definitions of terms like emf and torque. Some have expressed uncertainty about their progress and are looking for guidance on how to proceed further.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to external torques and the conditions for the rod's rotation, with participants attempting to clarify the definitions and relationships between the various physical quantities involved.

Physics lover
Messages
249
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
The question is put in Attempt at a solution.
Relevant Equations
emf induced in a rotating rod = Bwr##^2##/2
15654559849541435203991.jpg


I first calculated induced emf and then calculated torque about O.But what will i do further.I think i need to find current and then fidn emf=IR.
Help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show your work. It is supposed to go in "Attempt at a solution" but now it has to go in separate post. Ask yourself, "What does it mean to have the rod rotate at constant angular velocity?"
 
kuruman said:
Please show your work. It is supposed to go in "Attempt at a solution" but now it has to go in separate post. Ask yourself, "What does it mean to have the rod rotate at constant angular velocity?"
it means that there is not external torque that is torque of mg is balanced by torque of induced current.
 
kuruman said:
Please show your work. It is supposed to go in "Attempt at a solution" but now it has to go in separate post. Ask yourself, "What does it mean to have the rod rotate at constant angular velocity?"
i have shown how much i have proceeded far.Now i cannot do it further.
 
Physics lover said:
It means that there is not external torque that is torque of mg is balanced by torque of induced current.
And where is the equation that says that? Parenthetically, there are two external torques. What you meant to say is that there is no net torque. Right? This is a torque balance problem. What does one normally do with such problems? Hint: Free body diagram.
 
kuruman said:
And where is the equation that says that? Parenthetically, there are two external torques. What you meant to say is that there is no net torque. Right? This is a torque balance problem. What does one normally do with such problems? Hint: Free body diagram.
ok i think i got that.The emf to be find out will have its own torque =IBL which will balance the torque of mg and induced current.Am i right?
 
Physics lover said:
ok i think i got that.The emf to be find out will have its own torque =IBL which will balance the torque of mg and induced current.Am i right?
You are right except that IBL is a force, not a torque.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K