Emf induced in the windings of coil

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electromotive force (emf) induced in a tightly wound circular coil with 36.8 turns and a radius of 0.1m, subjected to a uniform magnetic field increasing from 0 to 0.42T over 0.251 seconds. The correct formula for emf is applied: emf = -N(dmagflux/dt), where the rate of change of the magnetic field (dB/dt) is calculated as 1.6733 T/s. The initial calculation yielded -1.934V, which was incorrect due to the need to report only the magnitude and the improper use of significant figures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Familiarity with the concept of magnetic flux
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for rate of change calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Faraday's Law and its applications in electromagnetic induction
  • Study the concept of magnetic flux and its calculation
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific reporting
  • Explore practical examples of induced emf in various coil configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electromagnetic induction and its applications in coil systems.

dmckeog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a tightly wound circular coil has 36.8 turns, each of radius .1m. the uniform magnetic field is in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the coil. the field increased linearly from 0 to .42t in a time of .251s.
what is the emf induced in the windings of the coil?


Homework Equations


emf=-N(dmagflux/dt)
dmagflux=dBA/dt
emf=-n*A*dB/dt
A=pi*r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



dB/dt is rate I determined to be .42t/.251s=1.6733tpersec

emf=-36.8*pi*.1m*.1m*1.6733t per sec=-1.934v

 
Physics news on Phys.org
i really don't know what i have done wrong but the answer is wrong please help
 
Your thinking and method are correct. A couple of reasons why your answer might be rejected:
  • They are just looking for the magnitude of the EMF, so no "-" sign is needed
  • Wrong number of significant figures in the answer.
 
thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K