1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

EMF v time graph vs change in flux v time

  1. Jun 11, 2012 #1

    alv

    User Avatar

    I'm actually a teacher and I can't explain this problem from the 2007 HSC. I've attached a copy of the question and the two graphs. The question shows a graph of change in magnetic flux vs time and asks you to choose which graph of induced emf best fits it. I don't understand why the induced emf is at max even while the change in flux increases (or decreases).

    I've searched for help on this but can't find it. I'd appreciate any explanation you could give me.

    Thanks
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Please see above


    2. Relevant equations
    Please see above


    3. The attempt at a solution
    Please see above
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 11, 2012 #2

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    emf= -ΔΦ/Δt, more accurately, the negative of the time derivative of the flux. The magnitude of the emf is maximum when the flux-time graph is steepest. ΔΦ is the change of the flux in time interval Δt.
    As the graph consists of linear segments, the emf is constant within one segment. The vertical lines do not mean anything.
    ehild
     
  4. Jun 11, 2012 #3
    Actually there's no maximum or minimum value. Just polarity change due to changes in gradient.Normally verticall line is dotted.
     
  5. Jun 15, 2012 #4

    alv

    User Avatar

    Thanks heaps for this.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: EMF v time graph vs change in flux v time
  1. Force v. Time Graphs (Replies: 2)

Loading...