Emptying a container and Efflux Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Container Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors influencing the efflux speed of a liquid from an orifice in a container. Participants explore how the orifice diameter and shape affect the rate at which the container is emptied, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the orifice diameter and shape could impact the speed at which a container is emptied, despite the continuity equation suggesting otherwise.
  • One participant questions the assumption that orifices can have shapes other than round, indicating a need for clarification on orifice types.
  • Another participant suggests that different orifice shapes could produce varying effects on fluid flow, even if they have the same cross-sectional area.
  • It is noted that for a circular orifice, a larger area may lead to a smaller exit velocity, but the time to empty the container might remain similar.
  • One participant explains that the exiting velocity is approximately constant at √2gh, but flow rate (Q) is influenced by orifice area and geometry, including factors like the vena contracta.
  • Participants discuss the Cv values associated with different orifice shapes, indicating that these values affect the exit velocity and flow rate.
  • There is a mention of pressure dynamics at the air/fluid interface and how fluid pressure relates to air pressure, raising questions about stagnation points and pressure differentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of orifice diameter and shape on efflux speed, with no consensus reached on the extent of these effects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of orifice geometry on flow characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of real-world applications versus theoretical models, including the influence of factors like vena contracta and Cv values, which may not be fully addressed in the discussion.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
TL;DR
fluid efflux speed and how quickly a container is emptied
Hello Forum,

The speed of efflux ##v_{efflux}## of a liquid, say water, from an orifice in the lower part of a container depends on the vertical distance between the free surface of the fluid and the lower position of the orifice in the container itself. The faster the speed ##v_{efflux}## the quicker the container will be emptied.

Assuming the same vertical separation between free surface and orifice position, how do the orifice diameter ##D## and the shape of the orifice impact the speed at which the container is emptied?

I believe that both the orifice diameter ##D## and shape should/could have an effect on how quickly the container gets emptied. Different orifice shapes would probably produce different ##v_{efflux}## for the same orifice diameter ##D##. In theory, the diameter ##D## should not matter since the continuity equation stating that ##D_1 v_1 = D_2 v_2## but I wonder if in real life a larger diameter ##D## would empty the container faster...

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the orifice has a diameterD, how could it be any other shape but round?
 
Sorry, I was not clear. I understand that there are indeed different orifice types. I guess they can have the same cross-sectional area but different effect:

1608763408336.png
 
fog37 said:
Sorry, I was not clear. I understand that there are indeed different orifice types. I guess they can have the same cross-sectional area but different effect:

View attachment 274974
In the case of approximating with Bernoulli’s equation, this is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fog37
Ok, so, assuming just a circular orifice, the larger the area the smaller ##v_{efflux}## and vice versa but the time it takes to empty the container is about the same.

As far as the different orifice shapes, they produce, I believe, a different spread/divergence of the exiting fluid from the orifice...
 
To answer your first question, the exiting velocity will be approximately constant at √2gh, but the flow is Q=v*A, so an orifice with twice the area will discharge twice the flow. This will be modified depending on the "vena contracta" of the exiting fluid, which depends on orifice geometry, but in general, the same orifice shape twice as big will have twice the flow.

The exit velocity is indeed affected by the shape of the orifice. Each orifice shape as a Cv value (not to be confused with the Cv Valve coefficient). For instance, the sharp edge orifice above has a Cv of 0.98, so the velocity is reduced by 2%. The short tube, on the other hand, has a Cv of 0.6 to 0.8 depending on if the fluid separates from the walls of the tube, so the exit velocity will be much less.

The effective area of the orifice will be affected by the vena contracta, as I said above. The reduction in area depends on the orifice geometry again, so each orifice geometry has a Cc value as well, which reduces the effective area. Cc for the sharp edged orifice is 0.63, for instance.

Putting it all together, the flow out of the orifice is Q=A*Cv*Cc*√2gh.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fog37
The Fez said:
To answer your first question, the exiting velocity will be approximately constant at √2gh, but the flow is Q=v*A, so an orifice with twice the area will discharge twice the flow. This will be modified depending on the "vena contracta" of the exiting fluid, which depends on orifice geometry, but in general, the same orifice shape twice as big will have twice the flow.

The exit velocity is indeed affected by the shape of the orifice. Each orifice shape as a Cv value (not to be confused with the Cv Valve coefficient). For instance, the sharp edge orifice above has a Cv of 0.98, so the velocity is reduced by 2%. The short tube, on the other hand, has a Cv of 0.6 to 0.8 depending on if the fluid separates from the walls of the tube, so the exit velocity will be much less.

The effective area of the orifice will be affected by the vena contracta, as I said above. The reduction in area depends on the orifice geometry again, so each orifice geometry has a Cc value as well, which reduces the effective area. Cc for the sharp edged orifice is 0.63, for instance.

Putting it all together, the flow out of the orifice is Q=A*Cv*Cc*√2gh.
Thank you Fez and Chestermiller.

Fez, when the fluid exits the container, the pressure at the air/fluid interface is equal to the existing air pressure, i.e. the air pressure is ##p_{air}## and the fluid pressure is ##p_{air}=p_{fluid}##.

I believe the pressure inside the fluid is also equal to ##p_{fluid}=p_{air}##. So the speed at which the fluid is moving does not affect the fluid pressure ##p_{fluid}##. However, if the fluid is brought to a stop, the pressure at that point(s), called stagnation points will be isotropic and ##p_{fluid} >p_{air}##.

Is that correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K